User talk:Killing Vector/Archives/2008/February

Three-revert rule
Please take care not to violate the three-revert rule with your edits at Homebrewing. Be aware that reverts to remove an external link are definitely not exempt from the 3RR. Stifle (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Continuation war; apology
It was me that blanked the result of this article; sorry, I just wanted to push people to the talk page. I've not been able to return before now. Xyl 54 (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Cider
Hi Stlemur. I appreciate your reasoning for the revert at Cider, but it's clear cut - trivia is dicouraged and unsourced material can be removed at any time. Please do not restore unsourced content without appropriate citations. Fact tags are not a magic bullet for including unreferenced content - Jimmy Wales and core policies are very clear on this point. Given the minor / trivial nature of the removed content, evidence of significance would be required to include the content. Noting your edit summary, this was certainly not a removal of "major brands" - only redlinks and nonlinked brands were removed, along with various points of trivia. This was by no means an "automatic" removal of content.  Dei z  talk 15:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no onus on editors attempting to cleanup articles to source content - that lies with the original contributor. The problem with these lists of miscellany that collect at the bottom of articles is not limited to cider, believe me. I note your disagreement, and am sorry if a couple of redlinks are notable and have articles on local Wikis, but the application of policy (unsourced and trivial items removed) was absolutely sound.  Dei z  talk 22:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)