User talk:Killthesleep

Speedy deletion of Jill st. john (band)
A tag has been placed on Jill st. john (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. bd_ (talk) 06:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for tagging this, but unfortunately wikipedia does not consider newness a sufficient justification for notability... In order to keep wikipedia from filling up with articles on topics of very little general interest, certain guidelines have been put in place to determine what is allowed in. I encourage you to read the above links and, if this band satisfies the notability requirements, make it clear in the article that it does so. Thanks, bd_ (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)