User talk:Killy-the-frog~enwiki

Re
I don't completely understand what you're saying. If you're native in Chinese, I can understand Mandarin, so feel free to post it in Chinese. Regarding your question; you said I missed an entry? I forgot to put something into the article? Well, on Wikipedia, we need verifiable citations, and I just insert whatever I find from Xinhua, CNN, NYTimes, etc. If you can find a reliable media source that talks about these "missing documents", then please, send me a link. Best of luck, --haha169 (talk) 17:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what the problem is. I found that sentence inserted in, but it was written with bad grammar. I had attempted to freshen it up. During my revision, if I had accidentally removed something, feel free to tell me, and I'll try and put it back in. Regards, haha169 (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I merged your inclusion with the paragraph above, as well as revisions. Perhaps it was a misunderstanding? --haha169 (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, first of all, I attempted to fix your spelling there. It vaguely reminds me of French..., especially your spelling of "victim" into "victime". Anyway, it may be possible that I left out some information, but keep in mind that we can't make the article stretch out too long. Perhaps you can leave a suggest on of how you'd like it on my talk page, I'll re-arrange it, and leave it here. We can discuss it between our talk pages until we achieve a win/win goal Is that good? --haha169 (talk) 04:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, there is an error in your sentence that I can't just fix. What agreement is this? I need to understand what the agreement is, since the first half of the sentence just talked about bribes, not an agreement. If all possible, it could be separated into to sentences, the latter explaining what agreement the corrupt officials offered. --haha169 (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. I can certainly make that "good" English, but the problem here is WP:N. I was merely trying to make it simpler by saying that parents protested and police intervened. WP:NPOV is also an issue here. --haha169 (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't say there was a problem with the source. That's WP:V, and I didn't use it as an example. The specifics are WP:N. I was really only interested in keeping the most necessary things. Look, how about: "It also reported cases in which officials bribed parents to keep quiet about the corruption, though some refused and continued protesting."
 * That entire thing is just a long and confusing way of saying "bribery". --haha169 (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You mean "threatened". Besides, writing down that parents were threatened if they protest is important, but is the agreement really useful enough to insert? Remember, we have to be vague to keep it NPOV, and quite frankly, I'm not so sure about the notability of this agreement. I've never heard of it before NY Times. --haha169 (talk) 05:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

It was never a question of reliability. Its a question about notability. Anyway, I'm aware of the talk within Sichuan province over this issue - but the American audience won't be. I think that a simple "Parents who protested were threatened by officials; while others were given money as an attempt to keep calm." --haha169 (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Sichuan earthquake is receiving low traffic; and few are going to edit that article. But if you honestly feel that your way is the best; by all means, do so. --haha169 (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That makes perfect sense...but I'm having a headache trying to figure out how to revise that in order to makes sure it is grammatically correct, yet still includes all the information. Um... --haha169 (talk) 04:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not missing key points - but rather random tidbits of information. Why not just insert it and see if SillyValley or Medshal have any ideas. --haha169 (talk) 16:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Killy-the-frog. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Killy-the-frog~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)