User talk:Kim Isabelle Van Oncen

Welcome!
Hello, Kim Isabelle Van Oncen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:43, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your page
I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that you meet the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to you, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what you claim or interviewing you. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that you are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
 * This is English-language Wikipedia, perhaps you intended to post |here?

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

More
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~.
 * First, as I said before, this is English-language Wikipedia, if you want to write in Dutch, you need |Dutch Wikipedia
 * You said because she does not want any false information on it... objective here is to set up a page with the correct information... before anyone else creates a page without the correct information. what she or you want is irrelevant, this isn't Facebook, you can't own a page, and anyone can post any facts as long as they have reliable sources
 * Because you have such an obvious conflict of interest, you should not write the article anyway, since it's unlike that you will write objectively. As I said, you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. Please read guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
 * Despite what I said in my first post, your article at the second attempt had no in-line references, just a "reference" at the bottom to a Christel Lacroix page that didn't mention her, and in any case obviously isn't an independent source. Without proper references, we don't know if anything on the page is actually true. Without verifiable facts, she can't be notable
 * Again, we have a page created in a single edit without Wikilinks or references, looks like a copyright violation again, although I haven't checked
 * As is expected with a self-posted vanity page, the unsourced text is promotional in tone, presenting your opinions as if they were facts. For example Dit deed bij Kim haar liefde voor de camera opflakkeren. Met dit vertrouwen op zak ging ze zichzelf voorstellen bij MTV België en deed mee aan een screentest. Dit was dan ook zo goed meegevallen dat ze enige tijd later naar buiten liep als de nieuwe presentatrice bij Nickelodeon... Hierin gaf ze een geheel eigen kijk op het nieuws in Antwerpen in 2011.

Another admin has already blocked another account, User:Bedja Design in relation to this article. We have reached that stage yet. I would prefer it if you didn't attempt to create this article, but if you do please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read all my comments above and Your first article. If you are unwilling or unable to comply with our rules, you could also be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)