User talk:Kim Post/Archive 1

DYK for Manuel Torres (diplomat)
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Richard Worsam Meade I
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (John Leamy (merchant)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating John Leamy (merchant).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Very nice article. I'd probably lose the long quote and incorporate the important aspects covered therein within the prose of the article. See WP:QUOTEFARM. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 14:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * 1798 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/1798 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/1798?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to John Leamy
 * November 28 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/November_28 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/November_28?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to John Leamy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Herbert Vivian
Thank you so much for your thorough and thoughtful comments about my first DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Herbert Vivian. I've worked on the article, and I believe I have addressed your comments. In doing so, I have found a significant new fact about Herbert Vivian, which has led to a new hook. I believe the article is now much improved, thanks to your comments. Thank you. I'd love to hear your further thoughts. Best, Railfan23 (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

John Leamy silhouette
Hi. See this diff, in case it's of any interest to you. The request was archived, because it was marked as 'resolved', so I thought I'd leave you a quick note in case you missed it. Cheers. -- Begoon 09:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Steele (physician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Clara ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/John_Steele_%28physician%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/John_Steele_%28physician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

CE
Hi, you recently copy edited Jennifer Aniston article after my request. Thank you again for that. I am also working on a different article and wanted to ask for your help. There's this sentence: "In lyceum, Margaret was in a rock band,[15] and in the band oNieboLepiej ("Much Better"), formed in January 2009, with whom she performed sung poetry.[16][17]". Something doesn't sound right to me when I read it. Or maybe it's just me. What do you think? ArturSik (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It's probably because "performed sung poetry" is hard to unpack; after the verb "performed" you get "sung" unexpectedly modifying "poetry". It might be simpler to say that she "sang poetry", or even merely that she "sang in the band OnieboLepiej", if the detail is not important to the article. Also, you already provide a context by saying it was when she was in lyceum (you'll want to wikilink that), so consider whether it's really necessary to say the band was formed in January 2009. Kim Post (talk) 15:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * "In lyceum, Margaret explored different music genres. She performed in a rock band,[15] and later joined the band oNieboLepiej ("Much Better"), with whom she sang poetry.[16][17]" - would that work better? ArturSik (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * That sounds better to me. Kim Post (talk) 20:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you. One more thing. In this sentence "Having co-written most of the songs on the record, she recalled that this time she was in charge whereas with Add the Blonde she listened to and took advice from her producers." again I'm not sure whether the first part, especially 'having co-written', is gramatically correct. ArturSik (talk) 01:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The sentence suggests that she she co-wrote most of the songs. It would be better to restructure the sentence so that she recalls she  she co-wrote most of the songs. When a sentence like this has a lot to say, but you don't want to break it up, I try to lead with the important point (that she was in control) and put the reasoning afterward. Kim Post (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think it would be better to write one sentence about her involvement in the songwriting for her albums in the 'Artistry' section of the article rather than write how many songs she wrote everytime she releases an album. So I've got this: "Margaret has been actively involved in the songwriting process of her albums since the beginning of her career. Whilst her debut album Add the Blonde (2014) contained only four songs co-written by her, she wrote on most of the songs on her subsequent releases.[6]" - what do you think? ArturSik (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You should give WP:DUE weight to the reliable sources. If most don't seem to think her writing is very important at all, it would make sense to reduce it to just that one sentence (in her biography, as opposed to an article about the specific album). Whereas if that's very important to her according to the sources, you'd want to go into more detail. I'm not sure "wrote on" is correct though; it seems more natural to say that she wrote or co-wrote the songs. Kim Post (talk) 23:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added more detailes about her songwriting and asked a user who's more familiar with the topic to review it. Thank you for your help and happy holidays. ArturSik (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 blitz bling
Thanks for all of your contributions and happy editing in the new year! – Reidgreg (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for John Steele House (Toquerville, Utah)
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brailsford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia v. Brailsford ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Brailsford check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Brailsford?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Brailsford
Hi Kim Post, regarding my edit to Brailsford, as per WP:HOWTODAB, I added '(disambiguation)' to show that the DAB link was intentional. Links that aren't denoted this way go on a list, Disambiguation pages with links, and will eventually be fixed/removed. Leschnei (talk) 19:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Interesting; I stand corrected. Kim Post (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are, , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for John Leamy (merchant)
– Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Manuel Torres (diplomat)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manuel Torres (diplomat) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your DYK hook on George Meade
Hi, I took a look at your DYK hook. It looks good to me, although I guess it will need to wait until the page move issue is resolved before it's moved to the front page. I also suggest clarifying in the hook that it was an early biographer who called Meade “A Patriot of the Revolutionary Era.” Thanks, Philepitta (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for George Meade (merchant)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

The WikiCup
As a WikiCup judge, I am allowing the Manuel Torres (diplomat) GA, although I should not do so if I applied the rules strictly. You have also claimed for the Thomas Forsyth House DYK too soon, before it has appeared on the main page. Please submit your claims at the correct time in future. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Forsyth House
Vanamonde (Talk) 12:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Feb 27 WikiWednesday Salon + Mar 2 MoMA Art+Feminism and beyond
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
 * 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
 * Flag of the United States Library of Congress 2.svg Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
 * Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

== March 20: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC + March 23: Asian Art Archive/New York Public Library ==

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Your GA nomination of Manuel Torres (diplomat)
The article Manuel Torres (diplomat) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Manuel Torres (diplomat) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)


 * It's greatly appreciated. Kim Post (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, and  Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 🇩🇰 MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
 * Pirate_Flag_of_Henry_Every.svg (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
 * Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you are a current participant in round 2 of this year's WikiCup! There are only a few days until the second round ends – if you haven't made you first submission for this round yet, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 05:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * 🇳🇫 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
 * Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
 * SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi
Hello. Help copy edit.Cheung2 (talk) 07:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twilight Struggle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eurogames ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Twilight_Struggle check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Twilight_Struggle?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Lyon Chandler
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Twilight Struggle request
Hi Kim Post, here is the article you requested. The date at WP:VG/RL was incorrect so this is really from Dec 2006. The citation should look like this: And here is the article: link

Good luck with the article! -Thibbs (talk) 13:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Richard Worsam Meade I
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Richard Worsam Meade I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Twilight Struggle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Twilight Struggle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Twilight Struggle
The article Twilight Struggle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Twilight Struggle for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 20:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Leamy (merchant)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Leamy (merchant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Bill's Old Bike Barn
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is, who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:


 * 1) with 964 points
 * 2) with 899 points
 * 3) with 817 points
 * 4) with 691 points
 * 5) with 388 points
 * 6) with 146 points
 * 7) with 145 points
 * 8) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!


 * wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
 * wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall.
 * wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Richard Worsam Meade I
The article Richard Worsam Meade I you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Richard Worsam Meade I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 20:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

History of Tobago
It looks like you're inactive right now, but I feel like I've finally gotten your requests done (more or less) on the History of Tobago GA review. Let me know if you return to editing any time soon. Guettarda (talk) 04:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Leamy (merchant)
The article John Leamy (merchant) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Leamy (merchant) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, do you think you will be able to address my comments soon? The article is close to meeting the criteria, but it does need a little work, and I cannot leave this open immediately. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Twilight Struggle
The article Twilight Struggle you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Twilight Struggle for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 22:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)