User talk:Kim daniel-zin

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel.zin
Hello Kim daniel-zin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel.zin for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Geo47 (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Didn't realize that you posted this so recently, so i removed the tag. My fault. In the future, try to use the "show preview" option to work on your article draft before you post it.Geo47 (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel.zin, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Kim daniel-zin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Spencer T♦ C 05:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel.zin


A tag has been placed on Daniel.zin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 04:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel.zin


A tag has been placed on Daniel.zin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)