User talk:Kimaaron

Welcome!

Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

In Wikipedia, new Users do not automatically receive a welcome; not even a machine-generated welcome. Welcome messages come from other Users. They are personal and genuine. They contain an offer of assistance if such assistance is ever desired.

I suggest to everyone I welcome that they may find some of the following helpful &mdash; there’s nothing personal in my suggestion and you may not need any of them: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on Talk pages (ie discussion pages) using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dolphin51 (talk) 22:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Bernoulli Principle article - wing and rotor - #3
I saw your response to my question about "inviscid" flow. The dilemma I mentioned is one of the many possible issues when you make simplifcation such as a non-viscous, non-compressable flows. The non-viscous part is what allows what I proposed as indpendent flow streams in such a fluid, since there's no interaction between streamlines (due to non-viscosity).

My real issue with the main article is covered in the link below. The ariticle states that Bernoulli can be used to calculate lift given known flows, but I am not aware of any actual air foil program that uses such a method. Instead some variation of the Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations are used, somewhat simplified, but not to the point of Bernoulli. One of the reasons I doubt Bernoulli accounts for all of the lift, is the fact that relative to the wing, a signircant part of the acceleration of air is perpendicular to the flow (centripetal component over cambered surface), wih no change in speed, but a signifcant factor in the production of lift.

Real World Application - wing and rotor - #3

Jeffareid (talk) 01:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

and please don't abbreviate it as Cal Tech!)
Yes, don't do that.

I have been going through wikipedia and correcting many misspelled "Cal Tech" entries. But I won't correct yours. Gah4 (talk) 01:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)