User talk:Kimand299

Thank you for welcoming me to wikipedia

January 2021
Your recent editing history at Aliens (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Aliens (film)
Hello Kimand299. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again before getting a consensus in your favor at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Empires map
Hi! I'm wondering if you would be interested in helping to improve the combined map of the British and Mongol empires, as discussed here. I'm happy to amend the map myself, but your comments would be invaluable. If you're not interested, that's OK. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 10:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 23:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 - Mysorean involvement in the American Revolutionary War
I saw that you undid my addition of the Kingdom of Mysore to the co-belligerent roster for the rebel side on the American Revolutionary War page, asking "Where is the proof that mysore(sic) went to war? What soldiers or leaders were involed(sic)?" This is a fair question to ask, especially given that I didn't provide a reference (unfortunately, I don't even know how!) I learned about the Mysorean-American informal alliance from this article (https://aeon.co/essays/why-american-revolutionaries-admired-the-rebels-of-mysore), which goes into detail about the American affinity for the Kingdom of Mysore, its Sultan, Hyder Ali, and his struggle against the East India Company and the British military, that happened concurrently with the American Revolutionary War. The rebels went so far as to name a ship the Hyder-Ally, a deliberate typo to emphasise their empathy. If you could insert a reference to the aforementioned article after I restore my addition, that would help me out a lot, as well as make it much less likely to get removed in the future (NEVER MIND, FIGURED IT OUT). Thanks, GnelfGnoblinGnome (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Iskandar323. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Genghis Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You haven't provided a single source for any of your claims - please do so on talk if you are able. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genghis Khan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''You have now been told by multiple other editors to take this to talk - which means participating in a discussion and waiting until a consensus is reached, not writing a single comment and then making the same changes. The recent source which you added says nothing relevant on the subject, except that the Mongol Empire pushed as far as the Danube, which is extremely ambiguous as that river runs from west of Poland through to the Black Sea.'' Iskandar323 (talk) 13:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm VernoWhitney. I noticed that you recently removed content from Superpower without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Genghis Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Superpower
I'm afraid I don't understand, but what do you mean by "More tangible sources needed for book source"? VernoWhitney (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Since you haven't replied anywhere, I've added Spanish Empire back into Superpower citing that same book source (since I still don't understand the issue with it) as well as a museum website explicitly calling it a superpower. Please communicate before removing it again. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Texas, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Same with New Mexico. Mind you, it almost looks like you are enforcing a kind of English-only mandate on the states of the US, though I'm sure you know there's no official language, and not all histories of all states are the same. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Going further back, this and this seem to show a similar pattern, of basically erasing visible indicators of a pre-US history for Texas and New Mexico. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * It should be consistent with all states of the US and no I'm enforcing it but let's create some consistency. Kimand299 (talk) 22:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)