User talk:Kimber1221

January 2013
Hello, I'm Narutolovehinata5. An edit that you recently made to Pokémon (anime) seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pokémon (anime). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pokémon (anime) with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Optakeover (Talk)   16:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Optakeover (Talk)   16:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 16:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * In view of the deliberately misleading edit summaries you have used in some edits, such as this one and this one, you are clearly not an innocent editor who didn't realise you were doing anything wrong. You are lucky to have been blocked for so short a time. Any more of the same may well result in an much longer block, maybe even an indefinite block. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)