User talk:Kimo3257

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glenn Beck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glenn Beck was changed by Kimo3257 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951289 on 2011-02-23T00:37:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Glenn Beck constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  00:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Glenn Beck. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Tide  rolls  00:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pro-life. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below.  Tide  rolls  00:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pro-life was changed by Kimo3257 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89244 on 2011-02-23T00:45:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid accusations that this posting violates WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)