User talk:Kindsouvik

Protection of Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir Page created by me
I have created a article about a school named "Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir" after the concern from the school and that page is reviewed and verified too created 1 year ago.... The school wants to protect the Introduction part including quick facts to be "Fully Protected" Please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kindsouvik (talk • contribs)
 * Hello. Wouldn't you like to make this request at WP:RFPP? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This is the page where users request to become an admin, not where users request an admin to take action. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 16:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This is not the place to request page protection. Also, please do not remove or alter other user's talk page comments. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This conversation was moved from Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Lourdes 2 where it was off-topic. Please see the comments above if you want to request protection modifications. Also, please be sure to sign your posts so people can better reply to you.  Thank you, —  xaosflux  Talk 16:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

"The school wants to protect the Introduction part"
Hate to be the one to tell you this, but if your are editing at the behest of the school, you may have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). WP:PAID might also apply. Please read and heed those two items. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
-- Amanda  (aka DQ) 02:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
{{Unblock|reason= I understood my fault. I will not to Sockpuppetry again. I don't do anything illegal and nor cause any harm to Wikipedia. I see some accounts blocked as claimed my account but that are not mine. I have only three accounts TechnifyLife and Fountaineditor Kindsouvik 10:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)