User talk:KingAntenor

Request for comments on infobox at United_States_presidential_election,_2016
An RfC was started at Talk:United_States_presidential_election,_2016 get comments on whether or not Castle and other write-ins should be added to the infobox. Your participation is appreciated.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  10:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New wikiProject invite
Hello, KingAntenor! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Bcharles (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of International Space Station visitors, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * - @Marchjuly I didn't upload any images. Before you revert my edits may I suggest you actually understand how to properly use WP:NONFREE? KingAntenor (talk) 22:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am aware that you didn't upload the file in question. If you carefully read the template you will see it says "it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page...." (underline added by me to clarify) . The two files you added to the article are licensed as non-free and their use in that article does not comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. So, may I suggest that before you add an image to an article that your check its licensing first. If it's a non-free logo, then check WP:NFCCP and maybe also MOS:LOGO to determine if the particular use complies with relevant policy. If you believe it does, then provide the non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC so that the file is not removed per WP:NFCCE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Portals
The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,   &mdash; The Transhumanist   10:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,  &mdash; The Transhumanist   22:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ping me. Thank you. -TT

WikiProject Socialism
Hello! I've noticed you have the WikiProject Socialism userbox in your user page, but you didn't sign up in the project. You can do so in the WikiProject Socialism page, clicking the Join WikiProject button. If you have any doubt, feel free to ask it in the WikiProject talk page. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Beresford
Why was my edit for the BeresFord reverted? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Unsourced and not really appropriate to have in a lead. Please refrain from adding unsourced or dubious content to the encyclopedia. KingAntenor (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

"Britannia (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Britannia (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in South Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mowbray. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Idaho Green Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idaho Green Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Idaho Green Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AusLondonder (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)