User talk:KingMorpheus/Archive 2007

Deep South Wrestling title
If you want the page moved, make a request at WP:RM. Just turning the page into a redirect is a no-no since it ruins the edit history of the page (which is not allowed at WP). TJ Spyke 22:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Major Brothers
Here is an explanation of why I reverted your edit: Naming conventions. TJ Spyke 03:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:TheMajorsBrothers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheMajorsBrothers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Jesse Dalton
Pages have to be moved by administrators to preserve the edit history for copyright purposes, rather than moved manually. How to fix cut and paste moves. McPhail 22:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Tony Braddock
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tony Braddock, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tony Braddock is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tony Braddock, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Tony Braddock itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Links
I appreciate that you're trying to help out at the Days of our Lives articles, but it seems that there are fair number of move wars going on. Since these moves are controversial, could you please be sure to check consensus for a move at the article's talkpage, before moving it? Other procedures for controversial moves can be seen at WP:RM, thanks. --Elonka 20:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Blanking of Ory DiMera
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Jason Morgan
You just cant completely uncited info about a character. Corpx 01:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Chief Mojo Risin
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chief Mojo Risin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chief Mojo Risin fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''verging on nonsense. AFAIK, no actual connection to article it redirects to. Prob OR.''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chief Mojo Risin, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Wes Novak

 * Hey, KingMorpheus, I like that you moved Wes Novak to Wes (AMC), since that has merged those two articles together...which were of the same character, but since he does have a last name and there's no other article on Wikipedia of the name Wes Novak, except this one, this article should definitely be titled Wes Novak (and without the title of AMC next to his name). I just wanted to let you know that I'm about to move that article to Wes Novak. See you around. Flyer22 21:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm back to state that I'm not even sure that his last name is Novak, but it had to have been reported as Novak for an editor here at Wikipedia to have created an article titled Wes Novak, unless that editor was just joking around, which I don't believe was the case there. I'm going to wait until I know that his last name is Novak for sure before I move that article to Wes Novak. His last name could have been originally reported as Novak, but then changed...or the source that reported his last name as Novak got it wrong. Anyway, we'll see. Flyer22 21:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wait, now it turns out that Wes is actually Richie Novak. Whoa. I mean, then I wonder who the guy is that's been following Annie for a little while since he held up Babe at The Comeback. I just read Richie Novak's updated article and either I missed the more important parts of last week's episodes of All My Children or those are spoilers in his article at this moment. Flyer22 16:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, we finally know now that Wes is not to be called Wes Novak. And, in case you didn't already know, though you would have come across it eventually, the article Richie Novak, the one who is actually Annie Lavery's brother, has been created. I'll see you around, KingMorpheus. Flyer22 08:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, I know that spoilers don't count on Wikipedia. So are you saying that Wes really isn't Richie, or that we can't say that he's Richie yet? I see that you've fixed that article quickly, of course, to change mention of Richie being Wes. Thanks for the heads-up on that matter. Was that just mis-information, or, as I asked before, just a spoiler? Flyer22 17:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * All cleared up. Flyer22 19:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Here. Flyer22 20:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Theresa Crane
Hello KingMorpheus, I just wanted to tell you, I plan to change Theresa Winthrop back to Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald Crane. Due to the fact that Alistair Crane is still alive, Theresa's marriages to Ethan Winthrop as well as Jared Casey are invalid. This means she never legally carried the last name Winthrop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBanks (talk • contribs) 13:53, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

WWE
WWE has been calling it the "ECW Championship" for a couple of months, I think it's safe to say that is the new name of the title. Would would mind changing it back please? TJ Spyke 01:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:StandStill.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StandStill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image
Why did you upload this image? Picaroon (t) 00:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * A more important question is why did you create the sockpuppet account and use it to vandalize other articles with the image? Thatcher131 03:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I did no such thing, I uploaded the image 'cause I thought it meant something--KingMorpheus 23:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, Checkuser determined that you are the same as BatWave. In any case, unless you took the girlie pic and have a signed model release, putting it here was a no-no. Thatcher131 02:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted images on userboxes
A non-free image was recently removed from one or more of your userboxes. Please be advised that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Wikipedia policy does not allow templates (which includes userboxes) or user pages to contain any copyrighted content not under a free license; so, for example, claims under "fair use" are explicitly rejected. This clause is to be interpreted strictly and without exception, for legal reasons. You can research Wikipedia's non-free content policy for more details.

I hope this does not discourage you from creating more userboxes; your contributions to Wikipedia are greatly appreciated. For images and other media that are freely available for use in userpages and userboxes, check out Wikimedia Commons. Thank you.

An additional note, I'm referring to User:Jw2034/stone roses2. The album image can only be used in articles since it's copyrighted. It's a drag, I know, but its policy. If you have any questions or suggestions, send me a message in my talk page. Thanks. - Mtmelendez (Talk 11:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

TNA Women's World Championship
The rightful title of TNA's new Women's division title is TNA Women's World Championship, per this article on TNAWrestling.com. What are you seeing that contradicts that?«»bd(talk stalk) 23:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Green/Generico
No, what makes them notable as a team? There is a reason that every WWE tag team doesn't have an article (and WWE is like Major League Baseball, ROH and PWG minor league baseball). Since I don't watch ROH or PWG (since I don't want to spend money on their DVDs just to see, if they were on TV in the US I would at least check them out) I can't be sure of their notability. TJ Spyke 23:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No Remorse Corps
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how No Remorse Corps is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:No Remorse Corps saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. One Night In Hackney 303  00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. One Night In Hackney 303  00:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nikki311 21:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Removing verifiable content
Soap show pages have a Coming and Going section. When it is published in a recognized publication that an actor is leaving and then posted under "Comings and Going" DO NOT REMOVE THAT INFORMATION. Your repeated removal of verifiable content could be considered vandalism. Repeated offenses will be reported.IrishLass0128 17:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:La's .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:La's .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:La's .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:La's .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Velvet Sky
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jamie Szantyr. Since you are interested in recreating Velvet Sky, you might want to participate in the Jamie Szantyr deletion review. -- Jreferee    t / c  23:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello KingMorpheus. An editor is objecting to a cross-namespace redirect you created pointing to User:ThisDude62/sandbox. Sandbox articles are intended for development, not publication. See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for the discussion. You are welcome to add your own comment there. EdJohnston 05:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Moving pages and why you don't do it
Regarding your moving of Belle Black, which has been moved back and protected from moves, here is why it is not done: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). There's a whole explanation there as to why we don't willy nilly move pages just because a character gets married. If you have any questions, feel free to ask, I have other discussions I can also direct you to. CelticGreen (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Jamie Szantyr (wrestler)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jamie Szantyr (wrestler), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: :. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamie Szantyr (wrestler)
A tag has been placed on Jamie Szantyr (wrestler), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SmashvilleBONK! 05:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)