User talk:KingMorpheus/Archive 2009

Archive
Your talk page is over 300K, you should consider archiving it. I suggest getting a bot to automatically do it.  TJ   Spyke   20:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes
Consensus at WT:PW is that the team is still not notable enough to warrant a separate article apart from the individual member's articles. Please stop recreating the article without trying to get consensus that the team is notable enough. You may start a discussion at WT:PW if you like. Nikki ♥  311  03:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I said that third party reliable sites would help the article prove that it satisfies WP:N. The article you created has none. Like I said, bring it up at WT:PW if you think you have an argument. Nikki  ♥  311  03:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If you continue to recreate the page, I am going to protect it from editing. You are being disruptive by going against established consensus that you've been told about multiple times by multiple people. If you want to try and create new consensus then fine, but you can't go against what has already been decided. Nikki  ♥  311  03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well the link you provided on my talk page has NiciVampireHeart and WrestlingLover saying the same thing in edit summaries.  Nikki  ♥  311  03:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sir, all I see is you. --KingMorpheus (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Scott Levy
What's the deal with this edit?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Levy&diff=281446917&oldid=280215512

You remove Online World of Wrestling sources in favor of it's older version, Obsessed with Wrestling. I also can't undo the edit for whatever reason, so I'll have to go back in and re-add the source manually unless you can give me a good reason for your reversion. Thanks, Gavyn Sykes (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I reverted, because someone removed relevant data about Raven's DDT (Even Flow/Raven Effect) didn't see it, whoops.--KingMorpheus (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

David Ogden Stiers
I reverted your edit adding the Gay Actor category to his page; his publicist has requested Wiki not post the information released by Gossip Boy; all mainstream media reporting goes back to the Gossip Boy story and cannot be used as sources themselves. Portia327 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

==

LGBT categories and bios of living people
Hi. I saw your edit on Clementine Ford's biography. Please note that official Wikipedia policy states religious and LGBT categories are not to be used on biographies of living people unless they publicly self-identify with the label in question, it is relevant to their public lives, and there is a citation. Ford does not identify as bisexual, she identifies as a lesbian, hence your inclusion of her in a bisexual category is not appropriate. Please keep these issues in mind in the future. Thank you. Asarelah (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that as a living person, she must self-identify. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Categories for details. Asarelah (talk) 02:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

The Hip-Hop Violinist
Debut album or not, it is not notable in Wikipedia terms unless it has significant 3rd party coverage by reliable sources. There is no indication in the article of such and therefore it does not meet our standards for stand alone articles. If you can add third party sourcing to show notability required for stand alone Wikipedia articles, please do so. (On a completely non-policy discussion, you may want to consider cleaning out some of your talk page to an archive or simply deleting historical material.) -- The Red Pen of Doom  00:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Common name policy again and again
I have explained WP:COMMONNAME to you before. You and TimothyBanks need to stop going against that policy, though TimothyBanks is worse than you are on that front. Randi Morgan's common name is Randi Morgan, not Randi Hubbard. As I have stated to you before, just because a female character gets married...it does not mean that her article should then be changed to her married name. When Randi has mainly been called Randi Hubbard for a year or two, since she is still currently a relatively new character, then, by all means, go ahead and move her article to her married name. Even then, it may be best to move it to Randi Morgan Hubbard. Flyer22 (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My friend, she HAS been around for a year. And all her storylines surround around her husband.--KingMorpheus (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * She has not been called Randi Hubbard for a year (or even married for a year), and most of her storylines surrounding her husband has no bearing on her common name. Flyer22 (talk) 01:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Stop claiming that the Main Event Mafia have disbanded unless you have a reliable source that supports your claim. Also, consider archiving your talkpage.  TJ   Spyke   05:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It's debatable whether one man can be a stable. That is besides the point, it needs to be sourced. Unsourced info can (and should) be deleted immediately.  TJ   Spyke   14:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

J.R. Smith
He's changed his mind about the name change. See Zagalejo^^^ 01:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)