User talk:King Avinash Gupta

Gupta
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Nosedown (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nosedown (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Kshatriya Gupta
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kshatriya Gupta, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Kshatriya Gupta appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kshatriya Gupta has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Please note that I modified the url b/c links to indianetzone.com are blocked by wikipedia. ErikHaugen (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Repeated Vandalism of the Gupta Empire article
You are continuously deleting a number of sections of the article Gupta Empire, with citations from the notable works on this subject and trying to insert your POV in the article. Your action is simply vandalism. Stop it immediately and if you really have any constructive suggestion, discuss the same in the discussion page. If you still continue to vandalize, your account may be requested for blocking permanently.Joy1963 (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Gupta Empire, you will be blocked from editing. X X X antiuser eh? 08:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Repeated vandalism of the Puranas article
In spite of repeated warnings, you have deleted some portions and posted personal comments in the article, Puranas. It is surely an act of vandalism. Stop it immediately.Joy1963 (talk) 10:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet
You have been. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Proposed deletion of Gupta Kshatriya


The article Gupta Kshatriya has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Seems like an original research article, created by a user with many sockpuppets and a history of incorrect/vandal edits to Gupta-related articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. X X X antiuser eh? 18:27, 15 February 2010 (UTC)