User talk:King David Jnr

Oduse David Oluwadamilola moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Oduse David Oluwadamilola, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cheers Mgbo120  18:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC

Updated References
The article has been updated with verifiable information. Please, move it back to the main space King David Jnr (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oduse David Oluwadamilola (March 11)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oduse_David_Oluwadamilola Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Legacypac was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Legacypac (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oduse David Oluwadamilola


The article Oduse David Oluwadamilola has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources nowhere near demonstrating that it meets notability guidelines WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, found nothing online either. Note that this was previously rejected at AfC, and that the initial editor circumvented this decision by moving it to mainspace themselves."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed,Rosguill talk 22:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Oduse David Oluwadamilola. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 22:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Oduse David Oluwadamilola for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oduse David Oluwadamilola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oduse David Oluwadamilola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 17:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Content Updated
The article in Discussion have been updated with content and online references. Please, kindly review the article and remove it from deletion log, as soon as possible. Thanks. King David Jnr (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Oduse David Oluwadamilola, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Buka Tigers Athletics Club


Hello, King David Jnr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Buka Tigers Athletics Club.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gigslance


A tag has been placed on Gigslance, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:05, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Abdulquddus Atiah seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)