User talk:King Dracula

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Plum couch Talk2Me 11:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Filmography
Hello, KingDracula, about the filmography: he also did somee porn movies with his sister. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.95.106 (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) None of the actor and actress pags that achieved featured status on Wikipedia has co-stars and directors in their filmography (see Katie Holmes or Lindsay Lohan). Since not every article is as comprehensive or "excellent" as featured articles, generally those whould serve as role models.
 * 2) An article is there to tell something about the subject. The subject of Surya's article is Surya. Information about co-stars and directors is information on movies (and it crowds the filmography) and therefore belongs into the movie articles.
 * 3) In the past, people have used co-stars and directors to show off "their" actor: Actor XYZ has played alongside actress XXX more times than actor ABC so therefore actor XYZ must be "better" than actor ABC - to prevent edit wars, generally those kind of ino goes right into the movie article.
 * 4) You are not alone. If you start to work on articles in the Indian Cinema project, why don't you have a look how the majority of the articles look like (e.g. the larger ones like Shahrukh Khan or Aishwarya Rai).
 * 5) User:Kadavul got banned for the same thing you are currently trying to do - it was considered vandalism and he got banned by an administrator. See here: If you don't want that to happen to you, I suggest you stop.

Oh, and the pictures you upoloaded are both lacking a source: and

Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 11:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Surya
Hello, Dracula.

Aside from my concerns about the filmography (see above), here are the others:


 * Saravanan Sivakumar popularly know as Surya (born in 23 July 1975), is an Indian actor in the Tamil film industry. He is known as Surya popularly and has rose to fame with this name. He is the son of Tamil actor Sivakumar. He is well-known for trying out off-beat roles in different films. Suriya is also the brand ambassador for large brands like Pepsi, TVS and Sunfeast Biscuits.

Surya mentioned twice, therefore should the second mention be cropped. Needless to say he rose to fame with this name, as he is "popularly known as Surya" --> cropped. Info about his family comes later -> double mention. Brand ambassdor mention, yes, (in his career), brands themselves: no, as WP does not advertise brands.

Do you wish to discuss the rest of the article as well, to prevent an edit war?

Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 11:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Well Done

Kamal Haasan
Please vote for the Kamal Haasan article to become an article to be improved to be featured here, Article Creation and Improvement Drive Thamizhan 14:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Template on Mahatma Gandhi
Hi King Dracula, I have removed the template put by you on Mahatma Gandhi. In future, please explain your rationale on the talk page while putting such generic templates else editors won't know what to improve/ discuss. -- Lost (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Happy new Year to you too!!
Hello, King Dracula, a great new year to you too! May you achieve your goals. Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 19:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:180px-Yuvan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Yuvan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Ajith-rajini-400.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ajith-rajini-400.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Holidays
Happy holidays to the king! No, seriously, enjoy yourselves and try hard to to bite too many maids over in gold old Transsylvania! :) Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 20:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Billaaa.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Billaaa.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Mango Racing
As you are the creator of this article, I would like to draw your attention to the need to assess its notability. If it is to avoid entering a deletion proposal, it needs significant improvement. At this time, it is not really even a stub, as it has virtually no context or facts. Please go to the article's talk page if you wish to comment. If you are unable to expand the article, but believe that it meets notability requirements, feel free to request help from other editors by leaving a message on the WP:Motorsport talk page. Adrian M. H. 16:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This article has now entered the deletion proposal process. Adrian M. H. 19:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back
Hi, Dracula, welcome back. Tried to visit your homepage, but unfortunately didn't find a link to it. If you display the URL at your user page, let me know. Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 19:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks good. I especially like the part with the tool box. Really practical. :) Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 21:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar
Hello, Dracula, welcome back. The current version of the article was created by User:Zora. I'm currently trying to find trustable sources to remove all the "" before other stuff can be added again. Problem with the old version was, that there were no sources cited for anything: salary, box office, success of movies, marriage, family, openings etc. I think it's important to re-build the article by adding sources and not merely stating facts without noting where they come from. Best regards, --Plum couch Talk2Me 19:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar
Hello, Dracula, I think you're absolutely right: we all should really talk about everything, before things get uneasy. Generally, I think Anwar's edits are a bit over the top, too, but I also think he provided lots of useful information also - however, there were no sources given. Generally, I think everything that is informative should be added to the article, given it is a) written in a neutral way. b) referenced. (Especially box office, salaries and noteworthy roles) c) mentionable. (I'm not sure, if it's noteworthy that he married a "Christian girl" -> she was grown up, so no "girl" anymore, and her religion belongs into *her* article.) Also, I think his filmography should look like Diane Keaton's, for example, since her article got featured - I mean, there's so much info on Kumar on the net; the article has definetely the potential to get feautured, or at least "Good", but we should play by the rules of previously featured article. What do you think? Best regards, --<font color="#BF7EE0">Plum <font color="#FFCC00">couch Talk2Me 00:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
See Special:Contributions/86.144.182.50. He just started editing and he award 10 users who had last edited Ajith Kumar with barnstars. If you want it, then you can restore. It looked like spam to me, that's why I reverted.  Nish kid 64  22:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Billa (2007 film)
Although the article is well-written and includes much information, it should remain at the Future class until it is released. Once it is released, and it keeps this same amount of information and then also box office and critic reception, this article could reach B class. Good job so far. Once it's released, look over the GA criteria and attempt to nominate it for a Good article. --Nehrams2020 05:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
As a known sockpuppet or meatpuppet of, this account has been blocked indefinitely due to that user's actions where he deliberately falsified image licensing information. Under WP:SOCK, you are not permitted to use this account to edit, nor are you permitted to use any other account, request that others edit for you, or edit from an IP address. --Yamla 20:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Swathi
I have nominated Swathi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Swathi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vaanmathi
An editor has nominated Vaanmathi, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello King Dracula! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Suvalakshmi -
 * 2) J. D. Jerry -

By2/redirects listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect By2/redirects. Since you had some involvement with the By2/redirects redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TJRC (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aacharya


The article Aacharya has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, no reliable sources. Nothing found via Google News or Google Web beyond a single review that was rather short on facts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)