User talk:King vishal singh

March 2014
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Paramara without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sitush (talk) 05:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jadhav, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Adam's Bridge. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paris1127 (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rajput. Sitush (talk) 10:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Adam's Bridge
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Adam's Bridge article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Adam's Bridge
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Adam's Bridge article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! MrBill3 (talk) 12:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Adams's Bridge shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

A question for you
What or who do you think NASA is and why are you saying NASA determined it was manmade? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Taunk
You added a word to a quotation - you must never do that. Dougweller (talk) 13:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yadav, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rajput clans without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Holkar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
You have been warned about removing content without explanation, and told how to use edit summaries to explain, but you're still removing content and you have still never used an edit summary. You have also been warned repeatedly about adding unsourced content. Also please stop marking major edits as minor. This is certainly not a minor edit. Please see Help:Minor edit. If you continue to take no account of reasonable warnings and advice, I'm afraid you will have to be blocked from editing. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC).


 * As mentioned above, please don't add unsourced content. If your only intention is to promote your ethnic group, Wikipedia is not the place to be -- a personal website or blog might be better suited for your writings. utcursch &#124; talk 05:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 06:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)