User talk:Kingblizza

January 2015
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Gay-Lussac's law with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gay-Lussac's law with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm FourViolas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Meek Mill— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FourViolas (talk) 03:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Meek Mill, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snowager (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 05:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)