User talk:Kingcarlo

A tag has been placed on Korg RK-100, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If the keyboard is really notable please say so in the article. Springnuts 22:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Keytar articles
A tag has been placed on Roland AXIS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Hi,

Pleae note that I have put speedy nomination tags on the Lync LN-4 and Yamaha KX-5 also. Springnuts 12:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I do not understand, none of these are blatant advertising and the roland AXIS is about a synthesizer and does not represent anything other than that.


 * Hi, the problem is that some keytars just don't seem very notable, in Wiki terms. Springnuts 19:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The thing is that wikipedia is used to find information and use to learn more aobut things. I first looked for these things on wikipedia and when i found nothing, thats when I decided to add them. What makes a keytar notable? Anyway, I thought they should have stayed but whatever you say goes I guess.


 * Not at all! Wiki works by consensus, and if the community decides they are notable then they stay.  If you look at this page [] you can follow the discussion (and add to it - give your thoughts - which may well be for "keep") about the Roland_AX7, and this will give us an idea about where the limits of notability are.  For what it is worth the consensus seems to be marginally on the side of "keep" so far!  Springnuts 09:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamal Sukphard
A tag has been placed on Jamal Sukphard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)