User talk:Kingfry

License tagging for Image:2006-05-06-reyes-large.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2006-05-06-reyes-large.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Def Jam: Icon
Please, do not modify Def Jam: Icon with incorrect info or putting in invalid links, like you did on Def Jam: Icon. Thanks. I'm trying to keep the page clean. If you do not understand Wikipedia, please use the sandbox. Thanks. Imper1um 04:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Santana Picture
CHANGE IT BACK! WE DON'T WANT THE PICTURE OF A HORSE ON THERE! NOW PLEASE! HP Jo ker  Leave me a message 05:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Stop replacing the Santana image. -- HP Jo ker  Leave me a message 05:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:David wright.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:David wright.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image on Johan Santana
Stop replacing images as you did here on the article Johan Santana. We've all agreed that the original image is better. Way better. HP Jo ker  Leave me a message 03:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Santana2.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Santana2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Metsa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Metsa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 21:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Devil Wears Prada (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please do not edit or change genres for articles about musical groups without even consulting the talk page. The Devil Wears Prada is a metalcore band and has been sourced as such numerous times. GunMetal Angel 03:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, seeing how you're contiuning to do it, consider this your second warning. Like I said, the stated information upon the article for The Devil Wears Prada is that they are a metalcore band, not simply, a metal band. You've already violated the three revert rule and since from the start you were making disruptive, unexplained, undiscussed changes (without sources), your edits have been considered vandalism. If you continue to do this I will report you •  GunMetal Angel  05:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)