User talk:KingofFilm/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Oscar Potential Nominees
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. —Thank you. A tag has been placed on Oscar Potential Nominees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Karenjc 23:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Starpointe Design
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. —Thank you. A tag has been placed on Starpointe Design requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Karenjc 23:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cute Mammals
A tag has been placed on Cute Mammals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Liquidluck✽talk 23:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alex. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 14:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Not vandalism. I just didn't state why. See the article again. KOF :) 20:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barbara Corcoran
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. —Thank you. A tag has been placed on Barbara Corcoran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alexf(talk) 14:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barbara Corcoran
A tag has been placed on Barbara Corcoran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Please cite sources
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Kayau Don't be too CNN I'LL DO MY JOB uprising! uprising! 14:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Reply:Vandal? Not me
I suppose you put this up on the article about boogies:

What Does A Booger Look Like?
A booger looks like a greenish slimy thing that is squishy. And that's nonsense. (It often isn't slimy or squishy. And often yellow and not green.) Anyway, you;d better read some wikipedia guidelines to see what's nonsense and what isn't. OK? Thanks,  Kayau  Don't be too CNN  I'LL DO MY JOB   uprising! uprising! 14:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC) It's not nonsense, it's a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.204.157.71 (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, smartypants, look there. A Wikipedia guideline says that we shouldn't say things like, 'He's a funny man with a red car and makes people laugh.' It doesn't help much if we say 'He's a humorous homo sapien with a scarlet small, private vehivle and causes amusement in other homo sapiens.' Same with this.  Kayau  Don't be too CNN  I'LL DO MY JOB   uprising! uprising! 02:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

If you used "He is CONSIDERED a very funny man with a red Civic and sometimes makes people laugh when he cracks a joke," that would cound because it doesn't show an opinion. KOF :) 11:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * First, this fact you just mentioned is pretty unencyclopaedic. Secondly, your booger thingy is unencyclopaedic so it is considered nonsense. Thirdly, it is nonsense so it is considered vandalism. Finally, a quick reminder that it's not a common practice to delete old messages. we archive them.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, fine, fine, you win. I don't know how to archive.KOF :) 18:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 

Kayau has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

To archive, go to User talk:KingofFilm/Archive 1. Throw all your old discussions in. Then add an archive template. Futher instructions can be found on WP:Archives.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 02:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Movies in the Berkshires


A tag has been placed on Movies in the Berkshires requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Warrah (talk) 01:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sasquatch (Film)


The article Sasquatch (Film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability questionable. No sources, no entry at IMDb.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 22:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Movies in the Berkshires
Don't tell me this, put a hangon tag on it and post in the talk page! Go! -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. That's step one.  Next part, then, is to fix it.  Like the note below here states, we're looking for notability, amongst some other things.  I'm gonna pull back for now so you have some time to fix it.  Good luck.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Your deleted pages
The only page of yours that I deleted which had any content was this: "Movies in the Berkshires is a small company. They have two theaters: Triplex Cinema, which was launched in 1995 with the movie Mighty Aphrodite, based in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, which typically played movies that are open in limited release. Since the Beacon Cinema, which opened in late 2009 with New Moon at a midnight showing opened, they have been showing more popular movies. The small theatre chain is not exactly called Movies in the Berkshires, though. It is unnamed, as of March 2010. When they remodeled a large building to create the Beacon Cinema, they spent millions of dollars to remodel the building that was a popular theatre over a decade ago. The Beacon has a small area in the side for rent that they seem to be hoping to rent out to make more money. The Triplex is located in a lot behind the main street in Great Barrington." The others were redirects and an entry in a list.

They were deleted because they gave no indication of notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases. From all the warning notices above, it looks as though you have not really understood this important requirement for a Wikipedia article. What it asks is, has someone independent of the subject thought it significant enough to write about? If not, it's probably not of enough interest to have an article. Read WP:My first article carefully to learn how to choose an acceptable subject and write an acceptable article. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

User of vandalism template
Could you please explain the reason why you have posted this message to editor Ethiopiashimsham. As far as I can see you haven't reverted any of their edits, and there is indeed no reason why you should. Favonian (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The edit seemed to be missing but the comparison showed it was there. The track showed no deletion after that but the text shown was something that was considered vandalism. 4 PAGES CREATED TO DATE. KingofFilm, the mighty Wikipedian. 22:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but your reply makes absolutely no sense. I have struck your note at the editor's talk page.  Please don't use such templates in the future without proper cause!  Favonian (talk) 23:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)