User talk:Kingoomieiii/Archive 3

UBX
LOL, I think I might like your atheist userbox better ;)  C T J F 8 3 Talk 20:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Me too. It's clear and concise, as opposed to the passive-aggressive eyepoke of the one UH removed. -- King Öomie 21:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

HRH Öomie
I usually do not address royalty before they speak to me first but you have done so on another page. I fail to see how waiting 2 days helps much. But I will wait. Long live HRH Öomie. Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback 2
–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback 3
I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 16:01, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback 4
I dream of horses @ 17:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

See my talkpage. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 16:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Why not of electric sheep? Too much kibble? . . dave souza, talk 21:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Questioning a sig on someone else's talkpage, are we? =P -- King Öomie 12:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

:-/
KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 13:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your sig
The funky shadow in your signature is giving me an acid flashback. The Real Libs-speak politely 17:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Stole the HTML from User:Ohms law =D -- King Öomie 18:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Gracias
Thanks for the spell check there. I use Firefox but often I'm on my laptop which only has IE.-- SKATER  Speak. 13:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * *Bow* -- King Öomie 13:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

E-mail
E-mail headed your way. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes I can be really helpful... and even be polite while doing it :-D
Sometimes I can be really helpful... and even be polite while doing it. :-D Almost sappy in my level of politeyness. And I haven't had any caffeine (or Kahlúa) yet today. About to remedy that though.... the caffeine that is. ( the Kahlua will come later on tonight ) OH WAIT!.. its Wednesday... that means its Jägermeister day!... wippee!! Nothing like a Jaggy n Red Bull at the end of the work day to completely wire your brain! The Real Libs-speak politely 13:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * PS don't laugh... your co-workers will think you're weird. The Real Libs-speak politely 13:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Libs... helpful and polite, at the same time? In the same edit? WITH NO VANDAL-TROLLING?
 * I need to go lie down. Breakfast of champions is Cheerios in Baileys, by the way. Shoe optional. -- King Öomie 13:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Yup I definitely watch your talk page. In Canada the breakfast of champs is Shreddies in beer. The Real Libs-speak politely 14:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Libs, do you know of this record label, on which one of my favourite Canadian bands are housed? I always think of them eating raw ox and maple leaf whiskey for breakfast, tbh. ;) – B.hotep •talk• 14:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've heard of beer with cereal, but I figure, baileys at least has dairy in it :P -- King Öomie 15:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 'ed ON MY OWN TALKPAGE!? WHY, I OUGHTTA...
 * (Maybe I shouldn't leave the edit window open for fucking half an hour while I take phonecalls, then)
 * Yeah, that'll do it!

Thanks
Thanks for the help, /b/ro.


 * No problem. There is something deeply wrong with continuing to press an issue after an unconditional apology. That need to be "more right" is unconscionable. -- King Öomie 19:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No kidding, mistakes=humanity no need for him to push it.-- SKATER  Speak. 19:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * FYI- unconditional apologies don't contain the word "however" since that's applying conditions...hence making them conditional apologies. For example, saying "Sorry I murdered your family with an axe, however they were being a little rude." would not qualify as an "unconditional apology".  Saying "Sorry I murdered your family with an axe." would.  You just got learned! --208.38.59.163 (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * And Cease and Desist doesn't mean "continue to mince words until you're satisfied"- hence "That need to be "more right" is unconscionable". Don't post here again unless you have actual business. -- King Öomie 16:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Second that emotion. – B.hotep •talk• 20:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to see someone has a modicum of sense :P -- King Öomie 20:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert
Don't freak out, not about you this time lol... 


 * As I recall, the last one was an RFC... =P -- King Öomie 20:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * THERE IS NO LINK HERE Wanna bet?


 * You know, I was just going back through the history of my talkpage to look for the rev where you posted the link to it. -- King Öomie 20:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to save you the trouble.-- SKATER  Speak. 20:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wikiquette Alert
Hello! In your interest, I have closed the dispute on the Wikiquette alert page. If there are anymore further attacks by that particular user, please notify any administrator on the WP:AIAV or myself so further actions can be done; since this issue has been posted as a dispute; a temporary block might be issued. Don't worry, this message will be posted on the talk page of all the users involved in the matter. Thank you! Happy editing! -- A3RO (mailbox)  02:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Understood. Thanks. -- King Öomie 12:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

 * From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
 * News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or User WPVG somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
 * Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
 * —WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot  03:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

The birther stuff.
As much as I agree that it's silly... who's to say what's untrue or true? I don't think that any one editor, such as yourself, can make that call. I wasn't keeping up on the discussion page there, but just from the last addition to it, I didn't see anything worthy of being considered "nonsense". Gpia7r (talk) 13:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * His comment was off-topic (and untrue). The discussion was about Limbaugh's position in/out of the Birther camp; that user posted to say the birthers were correct. His comments are backed by about as much evidence as "Hitler is alive and living in Guam!". -- King Öomie 13:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

warning to PRODUCER
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PRODUCER#WP:WQA_notification

yes, I did warn him! but he delted it.  --Añtó&#124; Àntó (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ugh. I see. -- King Öomie 13:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Quickie question
I think the subject of the article Pain Hertz fails WP:MUSIC in a glorious way. Do you concur? And, if you do... do you want to do "the deed?" The Real Libs-speak politely 14:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * They've got a website- they MUST be notable!!1!!1!
 * I'll take it from here. You're just trying to get out of filing a report :P (get Twinkle! makes AFD posting take about 12 seconds) -- King Öomie 14:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I timed it last time, it took me about 6 seconds. -- SKATER  Speak. 17:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * And what are your thoughts on this one? The Real Libs-speak politely 02:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd say that fails WP:MUSIC More then the other. Unfortunately, I don't have twinkle on my current computer.-- SKATER  Speak. 04:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Twinkle is account-bound... do you mean Huggle? -- King Öomie 05:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Signpost inline discussion
Hii! Regarding your thread about adding inline discussions to the Signpost, I've replied with something you might like. Your input would be hugely appreciated. P retzels Talk! 00:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Emailusness
Checkest thou email. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Kingoomieiii/Stalkernotice
It's still blank sub-page. However, once it's filled in it should transclude to the top of your user page. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I also checked the target you used on my talk page - User:Kingoomieiii\Stalkernotice - which would be incorrect... make sure you use the / and not the \ Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That should do it! Skier Dude  ( talk ) 05:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks much! -- King Öomie 05:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm??
Now there's an odd-duck AfD vote. I wonder who's sock/meat drawer that one came out of?

WQA
Thanks again for your beridging efforts.--Gilisa (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your effort. Gilisa is editing his remarks on WQA after you have already replied to them; can you figure out what is going on? Feketekave (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Festering
Connections Lumi has the ability to make grand contributions to Wikipedia. But the drawer should stay shut at all times. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have smacked you with an email trout. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Why you Wiki-sleuth you... :) Is that enough of a sim to twig J_Ron with? The Real Libs-speak politely 15:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Where are you getting that Lumi is a member of the band? -- King Öomie 15:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, WP:OUTING- leave that one alone. -- King Öomie 15:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no 'outing' he declared it himself. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't We have been alerted to the WQA, especially since my name has come up several times?-- SKATER  Speak. 00:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That's on him. Especially since he scolded me four or five times for not properly alerting people to the AFD. -- King Öomie 12:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

 * Opinion essay: White Barbarian
 * Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
 * Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
 * News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Do Me a Favor?
ActionShot Would you mind nominating that for deletion? If I had firefox on me I'd do it myself, but ya'know...school laptop and no Admin.-- SKATER  Speak. 15:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * What, with the load of bullshit thrown at me the LAST time I nominated something at someone else's request? Doesn't Twinkle work on IE too? -- King Öomie 15:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Meh, give that one a week anyway. Let's see how it can be improved. I will tag the crap out of it, though. -- King Öomie 15:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit- Removing a prod with no reason? In MY encyclopedia? It's more likely than you think. -- King Öomie 15:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Forget who you were talking too? I never unwatched your talkpage. To be honest I didn't even thing about last time, sorry 'bout that. Twinkle unfortunately dosen't work on IE, it sucks. Alright, let's give it that week anyway.-- SKATER  Speak. 16:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's fine. Middle-click-> TB tab-> Submit is force of habit. -- King Öomie 16:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I found this post...
Funny I already know that my behaviour is appropriate. Counting my 'libs' account.. all my anon IP years... and my original (now deleted) account from 2004-2005... my behaviour has earned me 27 barnstars and at least 16 requests to let my name stand for RfA. Can't get any more appropriate then that. I would send thank-yous for the vote of approval as given in that post. But my thank you would probably be misinterpreted as a PA. But the thank you would still be sincere. My behaviour has been been appropriate for almost 6 years and almost 70000 edits. Phew... where did the time go. besides into my grey temples and increasing crows-feet And also... The Real Libs-speak politely 17:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm like 95% sure he meant "inappropriate". -- King Öomie 18:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Not likely. That would be a violation of WP:NPA. It doesn't matter what he meant... what he ended up saying was 100% accurate. The Real Libs-speak politely 00:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Help
Hmm. What markup is required to force the title text in the barnstars/awards on my userpage to wrap, rather than squeezing out below my userboxes in a thin browser window? -- King Öomie 19:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean - I just looked at your user page with both firefox and internet explorer, and it seems fine. If I make the window narrow, the barnstar width shrinks down, and it all sorts itself out. Is it all OK now? Or...can you describe the problem a bit more?  Chzz  ►  19:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Under Firefox, when I reduce the width of the browser window past a certain point, the barnstars begin jumping to the bottom of the page, below the userbox container. -- King Öomie 19:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is understandable. The Userbox container is a div box, aligning itself right. If you reduce the browser window too much for the barnstars to fit there, they will make way for the userboxes because they are first in the wikitext. You can use a table to force them to stay above. See the example code below.


 * Hope that helps. Regards  So Why  20:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that seems to have done it. Thanks! -- King Öomie 20:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks as Usual
Just tried out Firefox! Works great Thanks for the site.-- SKATER  Speak. 14:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- King Öomie 14:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

 * New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
 * Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
 * News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmm
And people have the nerve to whine about me. The Real Libs-speak politely 13:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Lawl -- King Öomie 14:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Keep an eye on...
Jean-Pierre Danel. Either the manager, promotions department, or the guy himself are the creators/maintainers of this page. Major WP:COI issues. Major uncited claims on sales. Lots of WP:NPOV slips. Lots of WP:PEACOCKing. One of the worst case scenarios of the Wik being used for self-promotion. The subject is certainly notable enough for an article. But an encyclopaedic article would be preferred. Not a glorified fansite. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  04:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Wp:WQA
Hey King, I closed the WQA on Lips early as stuck. I recomend that WP:Truce be called.-- SKATER  Speak. 01:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Dear lord, be ready for fallout. -- King Öomie 01:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

To those of us...
born when there was a Kennedy in your Whitehouse. What's a spooge? :-) I sent you a video link for an absolutely horrid band. And in afterthought after doing so... I am sorry. If you haven't seen it yet don't watch it. It's painful. The Real Libs-speak politely 13:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, Lady Gaga is ridiculously awful. What the hell is a disco stick? Do I have to ask?
 * Here, let me google that for you =P  -- King Öomie 13:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Here's a strange one...
Goofy? The user created a page for a nobody band with a {db-band} template already built in to the article. Isn't that nice that to save someone else the trouble of giving it the speedy-boot tag. :-) The Real Libs-speak politely 13:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. At least he's honest. -- King Öomie 13:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * More people should do this, saves me the trouble....The trouble that makes me blue.-- SKATER  Speak. 14:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

What is a blind revert?
I saw you use the term here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring and I didn't recognize the term. Anyway, thanks for your input. I am simply trying to solve a problem that seems to have been occuring for months. As for why, I can't figure it out. The rules are clear. CraigMonroe (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * A blind revert is a revert that one editor or another thinks wasn't thought out. Though I see now I actually responded to the wrong section (or maybe the person I was talking to did). -- King Öomie 19:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see what happened- you started a new thread between two comments of an existing one- . -- King Öomie 19:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, I didn't even realize that. Lol. I will try to fix it. CraigMonroe (talk) 19:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

 * From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
 * Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
 * Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
 * News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
 * Dispatches: Sounds
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Might be something to watch out for.
Spooky's old IP, looks to just be a vandal now though.-- SKATER  Speak. 14:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... -- King Öomie 15:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Reply
-- SKATER  Speak. 19:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

-- SKATER  Speak. 20:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
 * In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Party Hats and Banana Milkshakes
seems to be taking advantage of the sock investigation to carry out some vendetta due to him being disgruntled against Libs. Why? I know Luminifer was mad that his spam article was deleted.  Triplestop  x3  21:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually wasn't mad about that - I've had plenty of articles deleted, and had plenty more that are still around. What did bother me (and mad is not the correct word to use - more like scared) was that Libs repeatedly (and now, that we know more, using sockpuppets when asked to desist) tried to OUT me as a member of the band in question. I had wondered why libs was targetting me specifically - now that I know about all the socks, it could easily be because of the first WQA I filed against Peter Fleet. I couldn't say why Sumbuddi is disgruntled, other than the fact that it's not an uncommon reaction being pressursed into 3rrs by sockpuppets. Luminifer (talk) 21:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Not that it excuses Wiki Lib's conduct, but are you sure you didn't try to cover up your COI because you knew it would affect the retention of your page? That is the way it seems to me right now.  Triplestop  x3  21:55, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think I should even answer that question, as answering it either way would be outing myself... and that's the point. There are proper avenues to pursue to deal with COI, and attempting to out an editor is not one of them. Additionally, COI should not - and does not - enter into deletion debates. They are judged purely on the merits of the arguments made - it's not like, were I member of a band, I would be able to make a better argument, and then, if it were discovered that I were a member, my argument falls apart. The arguments are purely merit based. COI, in fact, deals with article content, not deletion discussions. Further, if you'd read the deletion discussion, you would know that the way Libs described it is far from how it was... but really, I don't want to discuss this anymore, there isn't much point. Luminifer (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Good. I don't want to SEE that garbage about you being worried, distressed, etc about a post YOU MADE to YOUR USERPAGE being pointed to- and ESPECIALLY not on my own talkpage. It's crap. -- King Öomie  00:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The thing that gets me is that Luminifer was alerted BEFORE LIBS, way to bring in the cavalry there. It's definatly a COI.-- SKATER  Speak. 03:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Consider this: Luminifer was polite and respectful to me, whereas Libs is consistently rude to people he disagrees with. He also wasted large amounts of my time with sockpuppetry in an RFC, accused me of vandalism by using multiple anonymous identities and maliciously and anonymously started a revert war against me on a completely inconsequential page that he had no prior involvement with. I on the other hand followed the SPI rules, which do NOT require notification of the puppetmaster. Also Luminifer made a useful contribution to the SPI by pointing out additional socks that I hadn't noticed. So yes, notifying Luminifer was positive for Wikipedia. Sumbuddi (talk) 12:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This argument isn't going to take place here. Luminifer has been consistently disingenuous with me, whether it be whilst trying to save an article or trying to have Libs punished. How's the retirement, by the way? -- King Öomie  13:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, actually this argument did take place here - someone came on here questioning *my* motives. Not Luminifer's motives - someone with whom, as I say, have had no contact apart from him helping out with the SPI. And not the motives of the editor who abused Wikipedia for years with multiple identities. In case you hadn't noticed, the title of this section is Sumbuddi. Which explains why I'm here. Sumbuddi (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How Pavlovian. If you name it, they will come. How about now? -- King Öomie  13:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

VPR
Just so you know, I replied to your comment at VPR about the Welcomecreation notice. I do think this is a small change which would be slightly helpful, with no downside; but curiously, nobody else seems to care, or think the small benefit worth having... Rd232 talk 09:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

For the Record
I fully expect my Bannana Milkshake and Partyhat...-- SKATER  Speak. 16:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hot Space Talk Page
I was having a friendly debate between Wiki Libs (and his other accounts) on what genre Queen's Hot Space album was. Since he's been blocked, could you debate with me on it?--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 18:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm more of a Behemoth/Gorgoroth kind of guy, actually :P But I'll see if I can't download it and give it a listen...  -- King Öomie  18:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Plus, Hot Space was released six years before I was born =D -- King Öomie  18:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, Hot Space was released EIGHT years before I was born. lol--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Funk rock. Or disco. Or new wave. Or dance-pop. Sumbuddi (talk)
 * I was going to put "dance" and "funk" in the genres with a source--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I just edited the Hot Space article. Could you check my work?--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * NO GENRE CHANGES WITHOUT SOURCES. DEAR LORD. -- King Öomie  22:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I got them sourced-don't worry.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

User:70.150.94.194
Hi Kingoomieiii. IP editor 70.150.94.194 is badgering me about my decline of their speedy deletion tag on Category:Museums established in 1840. When User:Jpbowen created Category:Museums established in 1840, they noted that the page should be kept, despite the fact that it is empty (see here). This is perfectly valid and I see no reason to delete the page. However, this obviously doesn't sit well with 70.150.94.194. They're being rude and obnoxious and threatening forum shopping. I find it sad that many people don't understand that if they want others to help them, they need to be courteous and friendly and stop acting like everyone owes them something. Frankly, I don't want to continue this conversation with 70.150.94.194 anymore. If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate your input. Thanks,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Technically, an author note doesn't exempt a page from the speedy guidelines. Ask Jpbowen to weigh in- perhaps he has another solution. If the category is empty, it's empty- we can't exactly go back in time and establish a museum in 1840. -- King Öomie  02:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Email Reply
Replied to your email, sorry about it being so late.-- SKATER  Speak. 18:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Another email coming your way-- SKATER  Speak. 04:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I check my email more often than my talk page, but thanks :D -- King Öomie  22:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Interview: Interview with John Blossom
 * News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
 * In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News