User talk:Kingoomieiii/Archive 4

JPT
Sorry about the JPT Scare Band article. I was not the one who added all the uncited info and the source from the band's site. I'll try and clean it up later. Rockgenre (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Shrug, called it like I saw it. Wasn't a slight against you specifically. -- King Öomie  20:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, I cleaned up the JPT Scare Band article and rest assured they do pass notability. They have been played on two radio stations and featured in an article in Classic Rock Magazine titled "Lost Pioneers of Heavy Metal." Rockgenre (talk) 05:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Care to help?
User:Skater/Encore (Van Halen album) Your better in musical articles then I am.-- SKATER  Speak. 02:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Gave it a once-over. I'll comb Google for more information when I have time. -- King Öomie  16:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Apology
Sorry about the comment on the discussion page on "creation myths". After reflection I realise that I could have been less direct in my response.

Gregkaye (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

30 STM
Ummm, nice edit summary there. Not in the least patronising. The genre is sourced, having just looked at the edit history, it seems this has been added and removed constantly over the past few days. The simple fact is the band is described as emo, the source is reliable, and there is no need to remove it. Nouse4aname (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The simple fact is, there's an ongoing discussion on this exact subject at the talk page that you apparently have no intention of joining. And responding to a patronizing edit summary with sarcastic scolding is, if anything, vindicating. -- King Öomie  15:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool your attitude please and read WP:AGF before throwing such accusations around. The simple fact is, I saw the removal of a sourced genre, and so reverted it. Checking out the discussion reveals that it is not so much a discussion as a couple of users shouting that the band is not emo. The review clearly describes the record as emo "this is as earnest as an emo record gets". So what if it's not in the summary styles on the side? Neo-prog is included in the summary, but not even mentioned in the review, what does this tell you? Nouse4aname (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * And as far as the "giant note" goes, removing a sourced genre before any "discussion" has been concluded is in fact ignoring said note - restoring the sourced genre is not. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm clenching my AGF gland at the moment, actually. I don't have to like your methods to believe you're trying to help the article. That sourced genre has been posted and removed under a seemingly endless string of awful references, so barring dragging my browser through every diff going back months, I interpreted that note as meaning "Leave this section the hell alone". The first diff I saw was someone adding Emo to a band with an allmusic reference (which has about the same likelyhood of Constructive Edit status as a 15-byte IP edit to Dragonforce). First time for everything, I suppose. -- King Öomie  16:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well considering the genre is being removed by an IP and one registered user, with these deletions being reverted by 3 other editors (User:Gunmetal_Angel, User:GlassCobra, User:HalfShadow) in addition to myself, it seems that consensus is to leave the genre as is. As far as I am aware, Allmusic is prefectly acceptable as a reference for genres - if you disagree, perhaps you should discuss it a the appropriate place. Besides, hidden messages such as that are not binding in any way. Addition of a sourced genre can be done without discussion, whereas deletion of a sourced genre could be considered disruptive, particularly if it is repeated in the face of obvious opposition and consensus. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Allmusic HAS been discussed time and again, particularly in the context of their genre classification of metal bands (essentially guaranteed incorrect). Fails every time. I'm aware comments aren't binding, but they're generally a good indicator that *someone* is keeping an eye on the page. -- King Öomie  16:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please direct me to the decision that Allmusic should no longer be used as a reliable source on wikipedia... In my experience, these comments generally indicate that genre warring is rife hence the need for sources in the infobox. Removal of a sourced genre should be seen as disruptive, how restoring a sourced genre can be interpreted as such I don't know. Nouse4aname (talk) 16:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I meant that every discussion at the WP:RS noticeboard about allmusic has failed to have it removed. Regardless, I thought I was at least somewhat clear, but here it is again- I made a mistake. -- King Öomie  16:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Dee Iva
Posted the COI tag on his talk.-- SKATER  Speak. 21:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)-- SKATER  Speak. 21:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Time Flies (song)
Whatcha think?-- SKATER  Speak. 19:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that right now it qualifies for about five different speedy categories =P -- King Öomie  19:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps create an article for the album instead, and include the praise for individual songs. -- King Öomie  19:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Not my article, just came to it and wanted to see if I should go ahead and prod.-- SKATER  Speak. 21:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
GSK (talk ● evidence) 17:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: This
Thanks for remembering/knowing that it exists :-) - It's important that the list is regularly checked (I obviously can't do it anymore) by you and whoever (User:Enigmaman et al). I had some ideas for it before I left like archiving the IPs/accounts that have been blocked for long periods of time. That way we have a list of genre trolls that are fairly active and can be easily dealt with. Any help you give against genre trolls would be highly appreciated, my friend. Scarian Call me Pat!  22:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That particular user was tipped off to me. When I get some time, I'll see what I can do in the way of undoing the damage. I've used it a few times in the past- it's a great tool.
 * I'd be happy to help in any way I can. Genre trolls are a particular thorn. I must admit that, sadly, in my first few edits to Wikipedia (as an IP, years ago), I made edits very similar to genre trolling. I thought I was being genuinely helpful. At the time, WP:RS and WP:OR were foreign concepts to me. I can understand what might drive some to make such edits... what I CAN'T understand is that some INSIST on doing so even after being informed of the error of their ways. -- King Öomie  02:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Inb4 Spooky...I actually never edited much as an IP (The original "Skaterchild3" was created in the beginning of 7th grade...Let's just say if I had edited back then I wouldn't be in the .01).-- SKATER  Speak. 02:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Libs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wiki_libs#Early_Welcome_Back Care to cosign?
 * Indeed. I'd forgotten it was so soon. -- King Öomie 21:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I would of too had the though of "Isn't libs block expiring soon?" entered my head, feel free to get others to cosign.-- SKATER  Speak. 01:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

RFC discussion of User:CarolineWH
A request for comments has been filed concerning the conduct of. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Requests for comment/CarolineWH. If you want to wade any further into this quagmire :) --Paularblaster (talk) 15:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * So many fields... I don't know which [edit] button to hit :P -- King Öomie  15:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't Stalk me Anymore
Don't stalk me on my talk page about Social Anxiety Disorder. You don't know what you are talking about. Wikipedia articles about mental illness often have some helping non-profit links at the end. Leave me alone and leave legitimate links alone or you will be reported as a vandal and a stalker.

Sean7phil (talk) 21:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * On YOUR page? I edited FAVONIAN's page, which you have zero control over. I'm not here to entertain your idea of 'justice', so I'll be clear- DO NOT bring any more accusations and scare tactics to this page. Your issue is not anywhere near as important as you think it is, and it's hardly worth the time I'm taking to respond here. Edits you make that violate WP policies will be reverted, period. Regardless of how 'helpful' they are. WP:NOBLE- having noble intentions doesn't excuse you from wikipedia policies. Nonprofits do not have special privileges here. Our external link guidelines are in no way optional. Go ahead and report me- I've done nothing wrong. It's YOU who insists on pushing a change against policy, going so far as to harass editors who don't see it your way (case in point, you're here). -- King Öomie  22:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Sean7phil (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see - I've never edited that page. You're abusing Twinkle now. -- King Öomie  22:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Me reverting the genre warrior page
That information is false, and there's blatant POV issues on that page. That's why I'm getting rid of it. BTW WIKI LIBS was a starter behind it, so the page shouldn't EXIST in the first place.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not an article, so POV doesn't apply. Your argument is entirely invalid. The information is there on that page for editors with similar interests in taking down genre warriors. It was placed there under genuine suspicion, and it will remain until cleared by someone reputable. And for your records, Lib's SPI was a hatchet job. You don't get to decide to delete a userspace page because a blocked user has edited it. -- King Öomie 17:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice CSD tag. Even if someone were to wander by and delete that without reading, several admins use the page, and would certainly undelete it. -- King Öomie  17:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry if I'm coming off as rude, but there's NO EVIDENCE that I have MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And that one comment made absolutely NO SENSE! If that post is INVALID and false, then I have EVERY right to remove it.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 20:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If by that logic you then believe I have the right to march over to your talkpage and delete things I don't agree with, go right ahead. -- King Öomie  20:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Stay on subject! That page isn't even a TALK PAGE. It's a redirect from a user page to a page that lists genre trolls. Besides, there's nothing deleteable on my talk page, or your page, or Utax's. It's that REDIRECT page that concerns me.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 21:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What redirect? That page is a WP:SUBPAGE of Utan Vax's userspace, like all of these, and YOUR talkpage archive. -- King Öomie  21:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected on the "subpage" thing (I didn't know what word to use).--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 23:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Some appreciation
I've just started using Huggle- very impressive. It was heartwarming to discover that I was already on the whitelist.

Thank you for your time in developing the software, as well as your sheer, inhuman patience in supporting it. From the looks of the feedback page, some users have really put you through the wringer with suggestions that don't quite make sense- all the while maintaining a delightfully sardonic attitude (much like some of my favorite people). -- King Öomie 20:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Anyone with more than 500 contributions is on the whitelist, it's not that special.
 * There are some fairly major problems with Huggle so the complaints are justified. I have neither the time nor motivation to fix them, though. Gurch (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

barnstar!
Hah! Much obliged. Transplanting to userpage -- King Öomie  00:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Question
Okay, so after a long period of not editing, I log on to Wikipedia and I find a strange message about using multiple accounts. I went to the case page and I was listed with a whole lot of unrelated IPs and user accounts for some reason. And I saw you were teh one who added me there.

Why'd you do that? I have no relation to any of that and I hardly even edit.

Please be sure to take more care in the future, lest you make another glaring error like this again. Thanks. Alice Mudgarden (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Fun fact: CU checks resulting in blocks are now glaring errors -- King Öomie  14:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * So CU isn't working? Here come the socks Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I was being sarcastic. This user decided that her Confirmed sock status and subsequent warning by two separate admins was my glaring error for adding her to an SPI. -- King Öomie  15:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * For shame King.....It happens, how dare you let it...Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed, vindication was my first sign of wrongdoing. I'm terribly mean. She was A sock, just not of who I'd thought. -- King Öomie  16:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

You and your bum buddy here can be sarcastic all you want, but the fact is I hadn't edited in a long time, and my edits from months and years ago are actually very different from CosmicLegg - which anyone who isn't an idiot can see. CheckUser found that this user, whom I've never even came across before, was not me.

So before you reply to me with your bullshit about "CHECKUSER WAS POSITIVE LOLOLOL", sit down, relax, and have a think about it. The only things that your pathetic attempt at harassing someone you don't even know, who has not edited in months, has proven is that:-
 * You clearly have no idea what a similar editing pattern is, considering you think someone whose sole purpose here is to edit articles related to Jet, and someone who edits articles related to the Balkans are similar.
 * The dozens of IPs and accounts that you added, in addition to the hundreds already on that page were shown to be unrelated to myself.
 * Frvernchanezzz was not proven to be me - a lot of people make the mistake thinking that a positive CheckUser means they are the same person. This is incorrect. It simply means that in the two weeks prior to the CheckUser being performed, both accounts had logged on from the same IP. That is all.

I do realise that 12 year old virgins don't understand the concept of universities and shared accommodation, but some day, maybe (hopefully) you will.

However, if you persist with this libel against me, I will be forced to take legal action, much like I did in a similar situation back in 2007. The other party thought they couldn't be found over there in Greece, but they were, it went to trial, and the verdict was in my favour.

People make mistakes, and you need to learn to accept it when you've made one. Just take it in stride and move on. This could be a life changing experience for you! Alice Mudgarden (talk) 09:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * "In b4" you and Hell in a Bucket make inane remarks that no one could possibly find funny, behind my back, just like you guys do with seemingly everyone who disagrees with you and points out your errors. Cheers. Alice Mudgarden (talk) 09:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Legal Threat
I am being accused of censorship and advised to stop before "And it would be better than we were talking before our lawyers did so ..." The user page is [] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Xeno will 'correct' it if the threats continue. I agree with you in this particular case- the article exists purely for the sake of sympathy (and likely political posturing). -- King Öomie  19:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Written as was the article was begging for deletion. I tried ot give it a fighting chance. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The shape the article was in was only part of the problem. It's clear to me that the subject itself is presently unfit for entry. She is only notable for her death. If, as the user says, the French government makes a serious case out of this article's existence, that will be a separate event with its own article. The author obviously lacked a footing in Wikipedia policy (and don't get me wrong, I understand there are 18,000,000 policies)- but as I said on his talk, no free rides, no matter how sad people are. -- King Öomie  19:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I've also addressed the censorship accusation on the AFD. That's exactly the kind of argument that irritates me (as I believe you're aware :P) -- King Öomie  19:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasn't so much the censorship....The thing I saw in it was they stuck to Orwellian Speed of Light theories and the other faction Einsteins. I saw a series of increasingly bizarre interactions, unilaterally subject bans without consensus. I argued that individual administators couldn't page ban them without consensus. I was told that it is allowed "implicitly". The only thing I was reffering to was the attempts made to keep them out because of what I percieved as a different scientific viewpoint. I was just a bit off colour with the remark and anytime you attack seldom is the reaction good....
 * I had brought the issue up regarding JeHochman at Ani a few months ago, he threw my block record in my face. This was the first time I've been blocked since I first created my account so that had been building up for a little bit. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Ophélie Bretnacher
The case Bretnacher Ophelia is a problem of non-judicial and police cooperation between France and Hungary, violating the Treaty of Lisbon. is a matter concerningth are human rights and democracy in Europe

On Google : 307 000 Articles Ophelie Bretnacher Photos: 67 700 ... etc --Raymondnivet (talk) 09:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)


 * But this is not a reason for HER to have an article. It's a footnote in the foreign relations between the two nations. -- King Öomie  13:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * At this point the article doesn't have a snowballs chanvce in hell to survive deletion...Can we close before the water gets deeper?Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer an admin close while there are active keeps, stubborn as they may be. If it were unanimous, absolutely. -- King Öomie  18:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't the only active kep the creator? I doubt the creator is going ot back down. Thats sets a dangerous precedent in AFD, need we keep them open due to one vote? That's only my opinion of course. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep it open? No, I'm referring specifically to non-admin closure. In all likelyhood, an admin patrolling AFD will see it and delete as SNOW. -- King Öomie 19:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I had thought you were admin....If not have you considered running? You look like you might make a halfway decent one. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Hah! That's actually not the first time people have made that mistake. It's a possible eventuality- being able to block without AIV would be handy, etc etc... but as I'm currently approaching 4k edits, any RFA I filed in the immediate future would almost certainly end in WP:NOTNOW. That, and I'm fairly happy with what I do now- vandal hunting. I'd prefer not to hear from anyone who Opposes on the grounds that I'm not active enough on Portals, or Featured Article creation, or IRC, or whatever their pet project is. -- King Öomie 19:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno I've seen quite a few peopoe amke admoinwith less. It is admirable you are willing to acknowledge these things though. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Another gentle ping from WP:VG
Dear Kingoomieiii,

You are receiving this message because either [[:Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
 * Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot  21:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Signature issue
Saw your comment over there - thanks. I suppose the question was spurred by annoyance at having to do work (however slight) to find out who someone is in an AfD discussion, and I was looking for what the actual "rules" are. I'll prolly never pursue it, live and let live..., Thanks again. Vulture19 (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Christ myth
Hi you were active on the Christ Myth page during the month of december. It would be helpful to everyone if you indicated how you felt the conversation went in December Talk:Christ_myth_theory. Thanks in advance jbolden1517Talk 11:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

You found ...
... my favourite user page :) Hehehe. Ben (talk) 05:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's like talking to someone who has no interest in parsing what you're saying, but KNOWS that you're wrong.
 * No, that's exactly what it is. -- King Öomie  22:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Concern
Hi there; can you explain this use of rollback? <font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">Tan  &#124;  <font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39  20:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * misclick. ]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Catfish_Jim_and_the_soapdish#Oops]  -- King Öomie  20:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough - carry on :-) <font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">Tan  &#124;  <font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39  20:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh! :)
 * Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Creation according to Genesis FAQ
If you're interested in helping me with the FAQ for this article I'm working off of the following test page   Nefariousski (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good so far. I'll see if I can't do some sentence re-working. -- King Öomie  21:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Indentation
Not sure if it's your personal style as you've done it twice on Talk:Kent Hovind but your indentation level makes your posts appear as if you're replying to me. If you're doing this on purpose that's fine, as people can probably work out who you're replying to by reading your wording. -- Neil N  <sup style="font-family:Calibri;"> talk to me  02:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * In that case I let the wording speak for itself; it seemed preferable to having your comment and mine appear to be one. That's why I prefaced with 'IP' (though I haven't sunk to the dark depths of "@IP" yet). Sorry if there was any confusion. -- King Öomie  03:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Quick Request
Would you do me a favor and check this out and let me know if you think my line of thought regarding notability and usage of WP:Google is on point or if there is something I seem to not understand. It seems like such a clear case of notability failure to me but evidently others don't seem to agree. Nefariousski (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. There's an article there, but with the dearth of coverage about his TV show, WP:BIO1E thinks it's about his church, not him.

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Unhelpful arguments?
Hi!

I know you mean well, but I don't think these kinds of edits bring the debate forward. They're just bound to make others more enraged. Fichte once held a speech, during which his enraged audience started pelting him with stones. He picked up one of them and calmly said Ein Stein, Ihr Herren, ist kein Argument. ("A stone, gentlemen, is not an argument.") Gabbe (talk) 08:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, it was in poor taste. Though I'm at a loss as to how to argue with a group of people that have NO INTENTION of moving forward, and are doing everything in their power to move the argument back to a point where they were ahead. -- King Öomie  13:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

No idear
I've always wondered that myself. –<b style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">xeno</b><sup style="color:black;">talk 16:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Up for some Vandal Battle?
There's a Tsunami of vandalism at the Tosh.0 article going on right now that will likely last for the next day or two because of comments made on the show (Super funny show by the way if you haven't seen it yet). Thought you might be interested in watching it unfold. Nefariousski (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw it. I was thinking it might be smart to lock that page whenever the show mentions wikipedia, like the Colbert Report. -- King Öomie  18:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Nat Gertler Edit War
All of the diffs should be working know I believe... would you mind letting me know if I did something wrong. I am having trouble determining if he's technically reverted more than 4 times in one 24hr period though. It sure looks to my untrained eye that he's been edit warring though. Jstanierm (talk) 23:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Tillman...
...is not worth my time. It is he who is doing the insulting, not of me, but of the wikipedia readership, by insisting on this "myth" stuff - and only for the Bible, not the Quran or anything else. He absolutely will not budge from that POV. My solution to that is to not watch those articles anymore and to let others deal with that guy. But I'm going to point his POV-pushing out when I happen to run across it. Because he's flat out, dead wrong, and he knows it. And I know he knows it, because his response boils down to, "I don't care." ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 15:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I want to leave this message on your talk page
Your strong warning is uncalled for. Two changes don't call for this mis-use of a warning. And by the way, the term "myth" has NOT been dealt with. It was "dealt" with last Fall, that myth should remain out, and yet it made it back. Now you think it's dealt with?? (how convenient for you!) Why didn't you think it was dealt with last Fall when "myth" was rejected? 75.144.70.141 (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The page's self-styled owners have taken over, to call it a fairy tale in the first sentence, thus furthering wikipedia's reputation as dominated by liberals and atheists. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * "Self-styled" doesn't mean what you think it means. Seems a pattern of phrases I can say that about. -- King Öomie 20:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Self-styled adj (prenominal) claiming to be of a specified nature, quality, profession, etc.  -Collins English Dictionary
 * I implore, nay, beg you to show me a diff where ANYONE claims to WP:OWN any of those pages. -- King Öomie  20:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I tried to by stock on in this talk page but the price was too high.  The "Creation Myth" issue has been sorted out over and over and over just because certain users want to plug their ears and pretend it hasn't doesn't change the fact that the "Creation according to Genesis" article got consensus to be moved to Genesis creation myth, that the Creation Myth article has been stable for quite a long time and that it only seems to be fundamentalist christian editors losing their cool over this non-issue while everyone else accepts it for what it is.  Please feel free to read the following Talk:Genesis_creation_myth/FAQ if you want some clarification.  Nefariousski (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Consenus by shouting down those who want to keep it neutral. You may own the page, but that doesn't mean you get to own it in silence. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If you want to post here, fine, but I ask that your comments have at least a facet of truth. -- King Öomie  01:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

date arithmetic
if someone is blocked for 1 week on 11th february and today is 19th february, is that ban still current? (this question doesnt require an answer btw) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.140.53 (talk) 15:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

New keyboard
If I hadn't just swallowed my soda, you'd owe me a new keyboard. I just read your comment calling Moses recieving the Genesis story from god a "retcon," and nearly died laughing. Thanks, I needed that. &mdash;  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 17:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 300px Shipping as I speak. -- King Öomie 17:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback 1
Osarius : <font style="color:#accC10;background:#00000;">Natter, blahblah, nag 20:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

You know...
Don't know if anyone has ever asked you before, but... <div class="boilerplate metadata plainlinks" id="rfa" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #FFFAEF; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;"> Fastily would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then [ contact Fastily] to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for adminship/Kingoomieiii. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. You've been on my radar for some time now. Your superb talk page stalking, longtime familiarity with Wikipedia polices/guidelines, and fantastic contributions make you invaluable to the project; the admin corps would greatly benefit with you as a sysop. Please consider it - I'm confident you'll pass RfA with flying colors. Warmest Regards,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 21:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Even with one tenth the edits of the other two editors on that list? :P
 * Obviously, I'm flattered. Not sure I have the chops for it, but I suppose I could test the waters. Consider this my acceptance.-- King Öomie 21:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm assuming you, unlike some other people, actually have a life outside of Wikipedia. :P  But that's great!! I'm glad you're willing to give it a shot.  I've created the RfA page and well, it'd be cool if you could start by answering the questions.  I'm about to be busy in real life right in a bit but will have your nomination statement done before 6 UTC.  If all goes well we'll be live by then.  Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 22:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added my nomination statement. Feel free to transclude the RfA when you're ready :)  Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 07:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Kingoomieiii - I've gone ahead and transcluded your RfA, seeing that you've accepted the nom - hope that's alright with you. If not, please let me know and I'll place the RfA on hold indefinitely or until a time of your choosing.  Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 20:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)  Scratch that - I noticed the "Will expand later" note.  Sorry, -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 20:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It's about damn time King, you would be a great admin.-- SKATER  Speak. 01:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Appreciate the support. I haven't been active enough at RFA to know if I really have a shot in hell, but it would certainly be useful. -- King Öomie  04:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You're more qualified then me.-- SKATER  Speak. 07:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback 2
Osarius That's me! : Naggin' again? : What did I do?! 18:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:Templeknight
Just wanted to let you know that User:Templeknight is likely a sockpuppet. See Sockpuppet investigations/Bischof-Ralph. Wine Guy ~Talk  19:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

RfA question
Thank you for answering my question. I am still supporting! :) Best, --A NobodyMy talk 01:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. I appreciated the opportunity to set the record straight. -- King Öomie  01:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I just noticed you've got an empty block log ... I may have to rethink my support. --Malleus Fatuorum 01:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Now, now... -- King Öomie  01:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Malleus, I'm not into internet/txt talk, but I can think of nothing more fitting than... LOL! You are a genius, and if I ever come back, it will be as someone with your demeanor and outlook on the Wiki (which I think I already have after giving up the very tools King is seeking now). B.hotep (talk) 23:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Fairly early on, perhaps after my first or second block, someone consoled me with the idea that block logs are just battle scars, and I really do think there's some truth in it. I want to see some battle scars. :-) --Malleus Fatuorum 23:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

It's a shame that some editors are jumping to conclusions and assuming that because you frequently edit Talk:Genesis creation myth you are being partisan or stirring the pot. Too bad the talk page is so damn long that most of them can't be expected to sift through and realize that the vast majority of your editing amounts to an attempt to uphold policy and guidelines. It's like lumping the sheriff in with the criminals just because they both spend a lot of time at the jailhouse. Nefariousski (talk) 22:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. Same with opposing based on lack of content edits. Not all admins are journalists. Everyone has a different set of standards, obviously. -- King Öomie  22:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Well for what it's worth I'm pretty confident that were the policies in favor of not using "Creation Myth" you'd have supported said policy regardless of your personal thoughts (as would I for that matter). Best wishes on the RFA.  Nefariousski (talk) 21:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, looks like it's not going to pass now. -- King Öomie 21:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You've had a narrow escape then, count your blessings. --Malleus Fatuorum 23:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

ANI
I wanted to let you know I've started collecting information here: User:Nefariousski/sandbox/Creation Myth ANI. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, Ben (talk) 11:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm going to try and mine the talkpage for diffs that show examples of each of the items listed in the "some problems" section. It would be great if you had the time / inclination to toss in your 2 cents. I'm not particularly familiar with how a "topic ban" is submitted (having never been part of a topic ban discussion). From what I gather most topic bans are against particular users (banning said user from editing certain topics), I think it would be preferable to have a topic ban for the article (banning any user from discussing the "creation myth" topic for a period of time on said article) but I haven't seen any precedent for that in the bit of digging around I've done. Do you know of any good examples we could reference? Nefariousski (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA
I am very sorry, but your RfA did not demonstrate consensus to allow you access to the administrative maintenance toolset at this time. You should be heartened by the level of support you did receive, and I am certain that if you accept the community's constructive criticism regarding your perceived communication style, how your personal point of view (which is as valid as any other is) seems to affect your on-wiki editing, your focus on particular topics, and the other suggestions; and you are able to demonstrate over a reasonable period of time that you have addressed these concerns, you should have very little issue when volunteering your services as a sysop in the not-to-distant future. Thank you for volunteering! -- Avi (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh crap, off to write 100 thank you messages... -- King Öomie  18:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * make it 99 – i've thanked myself on your behalf 8)
 * it was a good showing ... swing on Sssoul (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I was on my way to register a last-minute support when it was closed. Not that it'd have made the difference so I don't have to feel guilty about being late to the party. Best of luck should you choose to try again. <b style="color:#0000FF;">Sher</b><b style="color:#6060BF;">eth</b> 21:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey King. I am sorry to see that your RfA turned out into a drama mongering mess, turning it into a RfA worse than most users endure.  All I can say is, for a first-timer like yourself, you did exceedingly well.  But alas, don't be discouraged, remember how strong you started out at RfA and treat this whole fiasco as a learning experience.  Take what constructive criticism you've received and use it to improve your editing. After several months, if you want to try again, please don't hesitate to drop me a line; I'd be more than happy to nominate you in the future.  I know you have what it takes to be a good sysop so keep up the good work! All the best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Me and all, I'm sorry too. Unlike Fastily, I wouldn't quite call it a fiasco, despite the best efforts of the Creation kids and their Onoes!Atheist!Bawww! effort at stubbornly insisting that their parents' faith is = to scientific objectivity - and that your failure to agree renders you unsuitable to do a bit of extra cleanup shit. You handled what must have been an infuriating process quite admirably. I hope you go up for it again. All the best, Plutonium27 (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed, though I wouldn't word it QUITE like that (because I'd see this diff at the next RFA if I did). It's still beyond me as to how arguing purely from a policy standpoint can be POV-pushing under any, any circumstances, but who knows. -- King Öomie  13:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No, you'll see this diff and the one above at your next RfA, as evidence this one taught you nothing.--Scott Mac (Doc) 09:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This is where my learning stops, yes. Here. Despite taking comments about 'badgering' to heart and stopping doing it. All further knowledge will bounce off my skull for the remainder of my days. -- King Öomie  13:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Call back in six months. -- King Öomie  15:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

If you're interested
Sorry the RfA didn't work out in your favor. If you're interested in creating a few new articles let me know, I'd be more than willing to lend a hand with research / content building. Nefariousski (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Part of the reason I've been so "lax" in content creation is because I've yet to search for information here and... not find it. Have any suggestions? -- King Öomie  18:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * For my own personal pet projects I'm planning on writing a few articles regarding micro habitats of marine mammals in Northern California (unique colonies of different groups of marine mammals). I've got a few BLP ideas for notable theorists in the Policy Debate world who have published books and been written up / cited in argumentation theory texts.  Not knowing you personally I have a hard time suggesting anything but BLPs are a dime a dozen, there are a ton of people out there that clearly pass WP:N and have multiple reliable sources / enough content to create an article.  There's a lot of room to create new science articles.  I personally enjoy fishing and have been wanting to write articles about different fishing techniques (e.g. "Mooching" plenty of sources available that discuss "how to", equipment, regulation, controversy, history etc...).  I'm considering forking an article off of Goat Rock Beach to discuss the marine mammal environment there including some very interesting case studies, one involving a rogue elephant seal that appearantly thought he was a harbor seal and unsuccessfully tried to either join or destroy their colony depending on how you look at the evidence.  If you're quick on the draw keep an eye out for current events, when you get that early morning east coast news try to use that info for contributions.  I hope my own ideas have helped you think of something you might be interested in creating.  I enjoy the research so when you come up with an article idea just give me a heads up and I'll gladly lend a hand.  I'm also a fairly frequent visitor over at XfD.  If you'd like I can send you a note when I come across interesting nominations that you might be interested in commenting on.  Nefariousski (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Most articles I've done have been about bands I've never heard of such as Down to Nothing and their albums...Then local football players, Content contribution is a mediocre way at best to tell if you can manage the tools-- SKATER  Speak. 18:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ...yyyyeah, I thinking I'm just not a content-creation kind of guy. All of that stuff sounds... well, less than riveting. -- King Öomie 19:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Have to say haven't been able to get back into wiki like I have been.-- SKATER  Speak. 19:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed but having one or two articles under your belt at least takes away some easy arguements from the opposition on the next RFA. Does your local city have a landmark that doesn't have an article?  How about your Mayor?  Any local highschools without an article?  Your old school?  All are pretty easy pickins since they specifically pass WP:N and tend to have enough reliable sources to build an article.  Nefariousski (talk) 19:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally being that you're into Video Games you might want to consider making an article about any VG characters that span multiple games. There's a good number that don't currently have articles but have abundant sources / analysis to warrant an article / disucssion in popular culture etc...  Nefariousski (talk) 19:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Your name popped up in Sockpuppet_investigations/Prophaniti as some sort of proof that there's some Sumbuddi related sockpuppetry going on. I'm not sure how the Diff above relates to the SPI at all and frankly everything about this SPI confuses me... Nefariousski (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * What the hell...? That edit, if I recall correctly, was to remove the grandstanding of a puppetmaster railing against 'the system'. Not sure how me removing his rant is evidence to anyone that I'm him. -- King Öomie 13:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for stalking me
Or, if not me, my talk page!

He's still mistaking me for a mastodon. Interesting somebody would get so upset over a mistaken reversion and poor grammar. Replying hasn't helped much, so I think it's best that you and I ignore him for a while and see what happens. --I dream of horses @ 14:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Creation myth / New editor
I am a new editor and have been trying to grasp a solid understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I have found that reading talk page debates about certain policies is the best way to learn how they should be accurately interpreted. I enjoyed reading the NPOV debates between you and others on the Creation myth article. I oppose changing the article title and feel that myth is the most accurate word choice. From what I gather after reading WP:NPOV & WP:TITLE, as well as the aforementioned talk page debates, my understanding of the term's legitimacy and compliance is: When an article title's NPOV is in dispute (or, when any particular terminology is in dispute), what matters is whether the terminology is the prevailing scholarly terminology of the sources referenced by the article, and whether the terminology bares connotations or offends certain individuals or groups of people does not matter. I have been drawing a mental comparison with the use of right-wing or left-wing in political articles (which, although they may allude to POVs, are scholarly and prevalent), or the article for the N word, as it would be silly (not to mention, nonencyclopedic) to exclude the article for use of that word, or give it a different title, simply on the basis that it may offend some people. Am I correct in my line of reasoning? I am new, but also a quick learner - so I am trying to wrap my mind around some of these policies before I do any major editing (or debating, :P). Any advice you may have would be well appreciated. <font color="#2c7c9f">John <font color="#1d5575">Shandy` • talk 03:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Pretty much. To paraphrase Nef, "If the term 'Dinosaur' offends Christians, we're not going to change the article to say Jesus-Horse. 'Dinosaur' is well-sourced and scholarly." Others prioritize WP:COMMONNAME with regard to the title, but as you so aptly pointed out, the article is called Nigger, not The 'N' Word. Wikipedia isn't censored. -- King Öomie  13:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I DO recall someone bringing up something or other about 'creation myth' not being well-sourced, or that something else was more prevalent amongst experts, but that kind of went away. -- King Öomie  13:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

What do ya think?
Requests for adminship/Skater 2 You are one of the users I admire, so before i even submit myself to the public I'd like to know what you think of me passing. -- SKATER  Speak. 16:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're less partisan and more content-focused than I am, so I'd say your chances are decent. -- King Öomie  01:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, guess we'll find out.-- SKATER  Speak. 02:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems they want more Meta edits out of you. -- King Öomie  12:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * And better knowledge of CSD, and apparently assumptions about my age hold weight. Ah well, more support then I did last time...-- SKATER  Speak. 23:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Signature
I actually forgot that you commented on this subject a few weeks ago. Well I actually fixed the tidle problem. And no need to revert yourself on other topics on my page. Anyone's opinion is welcome at any time. RG (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I reverted that edit because I realized I'd misread the sigs and thus misunderstood the entire conversation. But, thanks. -- King Öomie  04:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

RFA
Well, that went about as suspected. Thanks for your support as always my friend.-- SKATER  Speak. 00:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)

 * Newsletter delivery by <font face="Verdana" color="black">xenobot 17:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Moemon
Hello Kingoomieiii, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Moemon has been removed. It was removed by 75.33.219.230 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 75.33.219.230 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Saw you on Fark
''1. Make PEA archive

2. Fill it with watersports porn

3. ...

4. Profit''

Classic +1    Nefariousski (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I was so dissapointed that nobody got the joke, though. I should probably dump that account and get one not related to Wiki- i'm significantly more partisan there, and people get ideas. -- King Öomie  23:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * YOUR DOIN IT WRONG! It's not "..." It's "???", play him out keyboard cat.-- SKATER  Speak. 00:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've seen it both ways... -- King Öomie 00:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * On southpark (The memes originator according too The meme bible)) It was ???, ah well guess I should get back to trying to find something to edit around here.-- SKATER  Speak. 01:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Jerry Falwell
I thought these were unhelpful but good-faith edits until this one. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * My tip-off was this. Smelled sympathetic whitewasher a mile away. -- King Öomie  16:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer rights
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. – B.hotep •talk• 21:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Well hey, hey, hey. Thanks much. -- King Öomie  12:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Just as a side comment... do you think that User:CosmicLegg is near?
Just as a side comment... do you think that User:CosmicLegg is near? Wiki libs (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Not thinking that now. Leaning in a different meg-x direction now? Either which way... she is a glowing hypocrite based on her edit history. Wiki libs (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure about all that, but I see a serious failure to recognize 'nobody cares but you'.  -- King Öomie  12:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Compare recent wordy 'anti-zeppelin-metal' posts to one's like this Can't say that recent posts aren't amusing though. I am trying to see if there is some sort of secret code built into the consistent randomness of using capital letters in the most unappropriate of places. Perhaps signalling to some sort of hovering alien craft her co-ordinates for retrieval... or maybe just hoping for another alien probing? Wiki libs (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Different(?) editor... but At what confusion factor do you rank the edit summary attached to that edit? In what prt of the U.S does 'S' come before 'K' :-D Wiki libs (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh -- King Öomie  15:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BlockGW
Template:BlockGW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
A very Merry and safe Christmas Season to you and yours!!!!. Cheers! Wiki libs (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Aspartame
You seem to be the fairest of the aspartame group. I posted the following and it was removed. Question Once again I am faced with being banned. This controversy reminds me of a mayor faced with water of questionable quality. He called in all the experts who stated the water was perfectly legal. He then asked was it safe to drink. They all agreed it was. That it it met all the applicable standards. The mayor then asked how many of them would allow their own families to drink this water. The answer, None. The mayor then ruled that the water was not safe to drink. The moral is that public health should error on the side of safety. The people that have promoted Aspartame have a 20 year history of surmounting many obstacles. When the FDA ruled against Aspartame the industry simply got Ronald Reagan to replace the head of the FDA and mandate it’s use. If they can do this they can surely manipulate Wikipedia. My last point is to simply ask how many of you are comfortable with your families drinking diet drinks. Goodbye. Arydberg (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

It appears there is no common ground. Even for discussion. Just about everything that has been said against me I agree with but I see it on the other side. I've put in a lot of effort to try and understand the wikipedia point of view and see it as a devotion to a few principles, but I do not see these principles being applied equally to both sides of the issue. There are groups that believe in spirited debate and discussion. Here it is only allowed if you follow the party line. Please let me know if I am wrong. Thanks for your assistance  Arydberg (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This whole post is really a testament to your misunderstanding of the PURPOSE of wikipedia. Explicitly and by your own admission, you are here to advocate for a fringe belief, because you feel it's greatly important. In your drive to do so, you continually repeat answered questions, accuse others of being paid editors (even ON MY TALKPAGE), and are generally disruptive to the general effort to improve the page. Until you realize why this is NOT OKAY and WILL NOT BE ENTERTAINED, I really can't help you. PLEASE start by reading the links in this post. If at any time you believe they don't apply to what you're doing, you are quite mistaken. -- King Öomie  07:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Sum....some
Didn't you mean "some" (as in "some of which is notable"), rather than "sum"? That would be true, whereas "sum" wouldn't. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * No, I mean the sum total of the crowing being done about Aspartame makes the controversy notable, despite the individual parts being demonstrably irrelevant. -- King Öomie 01:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah ha! So that's what you meant. Okay....and true enough. That controversy would have died out many years ago if it hadn't been for the super activism of BM. If you are a glutton for punishment, try engaging her on Usenet. I have never done it there, but I have on other lists. She's incredible. She can fire off hundreds of super long emails every day. She's totally deluded and impervious to reason. -- Brangifer (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

AN/I notice...Aspartame
A complaint has been filed at AN/I located here. Since only two editors were notified, I'm placing a notice on the pages of all editors who have commented at Talk:Aspartame controversy in recent history. -- Brangifer (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Facepalm.jpg -- King Öomie  07:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Template for genre warriors?
User_talk:Enigmaman thanks,  Enigma <sup style="color:#FFA500;">msg  15:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks King!
Thanks for taking out the trash Sir!. Since me Mum's death 2 months ago my interest in the Wik has been nil. Estate liquidation, properties, business, lawyers and realtors can be time consuming. So this place is well below my radar. Your clean-up on my talk page was most appreciated. I've always said that every time I get a note like the one left by the inbred IP... it just means that every Wiki-edit I've done is valid and justified. Cheerioodles! Be back soon. Wiki libs (talk) 14:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
–MuZemike 14:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm back!
Miss me?-- SKATER  Is Back 13:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Gratitude for endless laughter
I was looking through some talk page archives for Creation myth this morning. It had been a long time since I'd seen you around in talk threads for articles I watch, but reading through the archives reminded me of your uncanny ability to tactfully dismantle ludicrous arguments with just the right hints of sarcasm and irony added in for flavor. I found myself literally laughing out loud at this particular find (starting at "You could have saved time and said..." in the collapsed part of the discussion).). My unsuspecting coworkers were giving me some funny looks. This made my day, so I just had to share.  John Shandy`   • talk 16:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Hey Buddy
Just dropping in to say her, it's been awhile. Hope all is well.-- SKATER  Is Back 17:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2012
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter (4th Quarter 2012)
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"> The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012

Previous issue | Index | Next issue <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;"> Project At a Glance As of Q4 2012, the project has:


 * 150 Featured Articles
 * 50 Featured Lists
 * 6 Featured Topics
 * 3 Featured Pictures


 * 45 A-Class Articles
 * 555 Good Articles
 * 12 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: "Strengthening and utilizing WP:VGs inter-language links"
 * Interview: Khanassassin

Project Navigation

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2013
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2013
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 05:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
<div style=" background-color: #eeeeee; border-top: 4px #eeeeee solid; border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; text-align: center; padding: 0.5em; margin:0em;"> The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017

Previous issue | Index | Next issue <div style="border-left: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-right: 2px #eeeeee solid; border-bottom: 5px #eeeeee solid; margin:0em;padding:1em; background:#FEFEFE;">

Project At a Glance As of Q2 2017, the project has:


 * 211 Featured Articles
 * 70 Featured Lists
 * 11 Featured Topics
 * 1 Featured Portals


 * 28 Featured Pictures
 * 1,172 Good Articles
 * 23 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: Shiny Wikipedians - A Featured Content Leaderboard
 * Feature: Final Fantasy VII postmortem

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 14:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)