User talk:Kingpin23

License tagging for Image:MrJulian.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MrJulian.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Business Man.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Business Man.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Keep It Gangsta2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Keep It Gangsta2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion notice
A tag has been placed on One Of A Kind (Julian Clarke Album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 09:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Your reverts
Please refrain from removing the notability tag on Julian Clarke. If you feel that this individual is notable, please provide suitable external references. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page.DayKart 10:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Refer to WP:NN for more information on this topic.DayKart 21:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Creation of inappropriate articles
Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as C.O.D.E. to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 00:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag removal
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Julian Clarke
While your contribution is appreciated, what you said is actually the problem. What is needed are reliable secondary sources to establish notability and to verify that the information is indeed correct-anyone can say anything or post whatever he or she likes on a Myspace page. Secondary source means one unaffiliated with and not written by the article's subject, some examples of reliable sources would be newspapers and magazines (which undergo editorial control and review) and peer-reviewed scientific publications (though those would be unlikely in a case like this). If you have any further questions or can find some sources and would like help citing them, please let me know! Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Created article deletion
Thanks for the thought! Though, blanked pages aren't actually deleted, and there are several bots which reverse page blankings as well (many vandals use this tactic). If you create a page, and then reconsider or decide it should be deleted before anyone else has done any significant edits to it, you can just put db-author on the page. This will notify an administrator (who can actually delete the page rather than just blanking it) that the author wishes for it to be deleted. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * And don't worry! We were all new here at one point or another. :) Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Sourcing
Absolutely! I can't really find anything on him like that, but if you can point me to those types of sources, I can sure help you put in citations for them. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid those really wouldn't. What establishes notability, which is what we use to determine suitability for an encyclopedia subject, is that the subject has been written about by sources that are subject to editorial control and fact-checking, and who are unaffiliated with the article subject. If those don't exist so far, it's likely the subject may not be suitable for an article quite yet. Of course, if music magazines, independent music critics, or the like get to writing about him once his career gets into swing, that will all change! If that's already happened, then those can certainly be used as reliable secondary sources. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Effectively...no, those new ones wouldn't either. Posters on forums aren't subject to editorial control or fact-checking, so forum posts, while they may be independent, are not reliable. You might want to have a read through WP:RS to see what qualifies reliability of a source. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 01:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bnw.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bnw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Newhair.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Newhair.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Keep_It_Gangsta2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Keep_It_Gangsta2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MrJulian.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MrJulian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 14:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Proactiv.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Proactiv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 14:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kidjulian.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kidjulian.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MER-C 13:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:JULIANsm.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JULIANsm.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 16:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

File:1Cover.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1Cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. – Quadell (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)