User talk:Kingpr0n

Discussion about your edits moved here:


 * User:Kingpr0n. Signed up today and his edits are quite inappropriate. Seems to have a interest in the female anus. User name probably considered offensive as well. Suspect he's simply a vandal, as he seems to know his way around well enough. I'm going to revert Tera Patrick and Sylvia Saint. Not going to touch current events. References: Tera Patrick, Sylvia Saint, Current Events -- Vudujava
 * I reverted Current events, and left a message for him(?) on his talk page. He's probably twelve. -- Finlay McWalter 15:09, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * He also blanked my user page and left his (rather unhelpful) response there. But he doesn't seem to have done any more changes in the wikipedia namespace (and his user page is none of my business). -- Finlay McWalter 19:55, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * In his defense, the alterations on the porn star pages were genuine additions of genuine information, albeit concerned exclusively with anal sex. Of course, that subject's not wildly surprising on a page about a porn star. (Whether it belong in wikipedia is another story.) But it can't objectively be called vandalism, I don't think. By the way, both starlet pages use the euphemism "erotic actress" rather than the more stright-forward and obvious "porn star". Why the weasel words? orthogonal 22:01, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * Making baseless claims about anal stretching is not exactly an appropriate entry. If he wants to do an article on the subject, fine, but saying this porn star or that engages in the practice is pure speculation. vudu 00:40, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm starting a stub article on Anal stretching. Kingpr0n, if you like, feel free to state the objective, NPOV facts as you perceive them.  It might be best to keep them there, and not to put allegations on individual actor/actress articles. I also wonder how seriously you take the whole thing, given the goatse reference on your user page, but that's a different issue...  -- Pakaran 02:29, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * Anyway, is it baseless speculation if there's documentary evidence? --Charles A. L. 13:24, Nov 14, 2003 (UTC)
 * I won't argue the practice of anal stretching (tho the idea makes my eyes water) as I know the practice exists. Baseless speculation would be claiming that Tera Patrick's motives for leaving the industry were to practice anal stretching AND to return for the express purpose of performing anal for big money. Show me reputable (for some value of reputable) documentation of either Ms Patrick or Ms. Saint's participation in such a practice. vudu 17:06, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * That's fair enough - and in that regard KingPr0n's edits were just as problematic as similiar edits in a less contraversal area of human knowledge - he's making claims that have no apparent factual justification. Nobody argues that a practice of stunt work in filmmaking exists, but saying that Ronald Reagan retired from the movies to gain that skill would be contraversal to say the least.  -- Pakaran 20:28, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)