User talk:Kings1005

If you look up copyrights The added name I put was correct

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mercedes King (September 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mercedes King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mercedes King, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mercedes_King Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mercedes_King reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

COI notice
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mercedes King
Hello, Kings1005. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mercedes King, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mercedes King


Hello, Kings1005. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mercedes King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Not in the Mood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Ss  112   17:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do your research on copyrights
If you look up copyrights you will see that’s one of the writers Please do your research on copyright Thank you Kings1005 (talk) 23:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is aimed toward me, you'd better learn how to tag somebody or post on their talk page because this looks silly. Stop adding fictional songwriters, probably your name, to articles, and all your edits to To the Moon (song) are just going to be reverted, so stop. Thank you.  Ss  112  

Look up copyrights is not hard to find out who are the writers It’s not fictional is public records Kings1005 (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If Mercedes King is a legitimate songwriter, why are there no Google search results for their name being attached to this song anywhere but on some basic, easy-to-dupe copyright.gov listing? That's what I thought. You will be blocked.  Ss  112   22:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at To the Moon (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Ss  112   22:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Final warnings

 * You need to use reliable sources when adding content. Until you understand what reliable means on Wikipedia, there's a list of usable sources at WP:RSMUSIC to help you.
 * Do not log out and edit anonymously when you are blocked from editing. It's not just your username that is blocked - it's you as a person.
 * I can't help but notice the parallel between your username and a majority of your edits. Wikipedia is not the place for you to write you own autobiography. Quite the opposite, it's considered a Conflict of Interest to be here strictly to write about yourself, or merely be here primarily to promote someone else.

In short, if you don't stop with how you've been editing, you're account is going to be indefinitely blocked. Please stop. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  16:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)