User talk:Kingstoken/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayfield Untied Church (October 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayfield Untied Church and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mayfield_Untied_Church Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chris_troutman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mayfield_Untied_Church reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 18:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

This account is not blocked, so please tell us exactly what message you get when you try to edit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'll ping as that's a checkuser block and ordinary admins can't handle it. Peridon (talk) 23:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Deprodding of Caroline Barry
I have removed the prod tag from Caroline Barry, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-proded, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Keep up the great work contributing articles like Major Dodson to Wikipedia!

Sadads (talk) 03:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 

Evan_Matthew_Cohen
This kid was on twenty-five episodes of Malcolm in the Middle, a hit, award-winning show. Are you sure that he's not notable? Bearian (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Katherine McGrath
I deprodded this one. It's clear to me that she's notable; she was "Billy Elliott's grandma" on Broadway. I can totally understand why you didn't want to be bothered looking for sources, because she has a common name. I also understand that you might be young enough not to know who the hell she is. I also totally get that the sourcing was, and remains, weak. However, with a little sleuthing I found a New York Times article and lots of images and insider-theater stories. Bearian (talk) 23:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)