User talk:Kingznqueenzllc777

Welcome!

Hello, Kingznqueenzllc777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Cappadonna have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type   on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 08:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm JesseRafe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cappadonna seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''With a username like yours, it's hard to distinguish where and whether you have a conflict of interest (COI) with a portion of the updates you just made. Other than they were poorly written and spelled, so on the whole I reverted the changes to the previous version of the article. The fewer changes you make at a time, and the less-obvious spam/COI issues, as well as better writing (proofreading and spellcheck kills no one) could get your changes to stick, but most important of all, well-cited SOURCED material.'' JesseRafe (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)