User talk:Kipepea

Proposed deletion of Hans-Joachim Schäfers


The article Hans-Joachim Schäfers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Calton | Talk 14:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The Portrait of H.-J. Schäfer will be complemented by a a separate new article dealing with "Aortic reconstruction", referring to the work of Hans-Joachim Schäfers and linked to his article. This article has already been written in the German Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aortenklappenrekonstruktion) . The new article will resolve the reference/"orphan"topic. Please give one month time to translate this article into english Wikipedia. Thanks Kipepea (talk) 19:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * References citing and adopting Schäfer's work are added in the article today. Kipepea (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Biographies
I've noticed that you've created/are creating a slew of German medical biographies. Thank you for the effort, but my (brief) survey shows some obvious shortcomings.


 * Notability: subjects of articles must show show evidence of notability in the wider world. Professional accomplishments are not sufficient, but subjects must meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines:
 * If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.
 * "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it need not be the main topic of the source material. 


 * Sources: all articles -- and most especially biographies -- require reliable sources which are independent of the subject to attest to their factuality. I found many citations to works BY the subjects, but nothing ABOUT subjects. Again, from Wikipedia's general notability guidelines:


 * ''"Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.'
 *  "Sources" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
 *  "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.

--Calton | Talk 14:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aortic valve repair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annulus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mosaad Megahed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mosaad Megahed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mosaad Megahed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slashme (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Siroos Mirzaei. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Relation to subject matter
You are required to declare your relation to the subject matter you write about. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Once we get proper disclosure you can return to editing. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not use thumbnails inside of infoboxesas you did to Siroos Mirzaei. Note that this is your second warning regarding this issue. Continuing to add thumbnails will be seen as disruptive editing. For more information please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. When adding an image, instead of doing:

SomeImage.jpg

You can simply supply the name of the image. So in this case just do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

See
Please read Help:Maintenance template removal. Do not remove the tag until the related issues have been addressed. If - and I am saying if - you believe that the tag was added because of your edits, you cannot be the one to remove it. I have no idea why the tag was placed but the section of the talk page you are referencing does not refer to the subject matter of the tag. Jytdog (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the User:Kipepea/Martin Parniske page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=763851144 your edit] caused a DOI error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F763851144%7CUser:Kipepea/Martin Parniske%5D%5D Ask for help])

Concerns
Here Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 12:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
I went through and marked the pages listed there as UPE and have cc tagged their talk pages. Some more recent work here was not disclosed there but is in line with it, so i marked those too. Jytdog (talk) 09:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Doc James in the course of this I came across who is a SPA for Jürgen Brosius and like the sock/master, added refs to their works or name to another article like here, here, and others. also made a few really constructive/non-selfish edits like this.... sock or subject i wonder... Jytdog (talk) 09:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Jytdog Likely the subject themselves. This is a common pattern. Both the person hired and the person doing the hiring edit the Wikipedia article together. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep. Jytdog (talk) 09:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)