User talk:Kirkus.casey

Welcome

 * }

The real issue here is that there was INCORRECT information on the Kirkus Reviews page. In support of full transparency, I used the named Kirkus.Casey so everyone would know exactly who edited the information. The incorrect information was harmful to our business which is completely unacceptable. I created this page to ensure the truth is reported about Kirkus, good and bad. I will take your advice and change my name. Now, it will not be clear who is changing the page and why. I was trying to be honest.
 * Hi Casey. Due to your conflict of interest in this area, please add any changes you would like to make to the talk page of the article with an Edit request template and someone will come along shortly to resolve the problems for you .  Nik the  stoned  16:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Kirkus.casey) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Kirkus Reviews. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  11:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)