User talk:Kirkwood123

Welcome!
Hello, Kirkwood123. I saw your contributions and want to welcome to you the free encyclopedia anyone can edit.

Thank you for joining our community and becoming a Wikipedian. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

If you need help, see Questions or our tutorial. Last but not least, the five pillars of Wikipedia explain what we're all here to do.

Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page Matao guitar here. I did this because http://i43.tinypic.com/2hfq9ll.jpg is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Instead of linking to an external image, you can find images already available or use the upload wizard if you'd like to add new free content. We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk. Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Matao guitar was changed by Kirkwood123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-09-28T10:56:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Matao guitar
Kirkwood, while I appreciate your zeal, your edits to Matao guitar are not in line with our policies and guidelines regarding such things as neutrality, references, etc. If you wish to improve the article, find reliable secondary sources to verify the content--don't add back information that was removed because it was unverified, promotional, etc. I note that did some positive work here as well (but Clusternote, please realize that a trademark reference is primary, not secondary) and you can't just go around reverting without explanation in defiance of policy. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Stop. "This page is a popular database of an American classic" is simply not true: even if the page were popular, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database. Your information lacks even the most basic verification, and the very title is a misnomer. Drmies (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)