User talk:Kirschtaria

Welcome!
Hello, Kirschtaria, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Military of chola, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military of chola


A tag has been placed on Category:Military of chola indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

2023/5/12
Hello, I'm 梦随飞絮. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source and reasons. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 梦随飞絮 13:57, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

July
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baekje. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qiushufang (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Alteration without explanation
Hi:) @Kirschtaria I have noticed many times that you do not give any explanation about the change you made to an article. Please note that it is essential for the use of Wikipedia to give explanation about a specific change, to know what you want to reach with a change. For deletion and unexplained changes admins could block you. Please note that in the future, and contribute to a even better Wikipedia. Thanks ;) Jeon Chin-hae 전친해50 (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:Queens Regnant of India


The page Category:Queens Regnant of India has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kings of England has been nominated for deletion
Category:Kings of England has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hyeokgeose of Silla, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deified Indian people


A tag has been placed on Category:Deified Indian people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Drmies (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Monarchs versus Kings
The names "Monarchs of XXX" were chosen for a reason. Therefore I have reverted your changes to Goguryeo, Baekje, Koryeo & Joseon. Moreover, you were right when not using Seondeok $$ \in $$ "Kings of Silla". You should finish the job and restore the right categories for all of the Korean monarchs. Pldx1 (talk) 19:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Categories
Hello, Kirschtaria,

Please do not empty longstanding categories "out of process" in favor of a brand new category you created and then tag the old category for speedy deletion, CSD C1. If you believe a category page title is no longer suitable, then nominate it for a category rename at Categories for Discussion. It's important to retain the page history with existing pages and rename them rather than creating new, slightly different categories. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Forms of Hindu deities has been nominated for deletion
Category:Forms of Hindu deities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 04:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kim Yu-sin has been nominated for deletion
Category:Kim Yu-sin has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Halls has been nominated for merging
Category:Halls has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mythological Greek royalty has been nominated for renaming
Category:Mythological Greek royalty has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mythological Indian royalty has been nominated for renaming
Category:Mythological Indian royalty has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kings of Silla has been nominated for merging
Category:Kings of Silla has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Korean kings has been nominated for merging
Category:Korean kings has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kings of Taebong has been nominated for renaming
Category:Kings of Taebong has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kings of Daegaya has been nominated for merging
Category:Kings of Daegaya has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kings of Geumgwan Gaya has been nominated for splitting
Category:Kings of Geumgwan Gaya has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kings of Later Baekje has been nominated for splitting
Category:Kings of Later Baekje has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mythological kings of Anga


A tag has been placed on Category:Mythological kings of Anga indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 09:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Identity related to Avanti verman, he was belong to chamar caste
I m so much curious about to know about utpala dynasty or Raja Avanti verman. Here are some evidence in Ain-i-akbari translated by colonel H.S.jarrett in 1891 and this book is over indianculture.gov.in  here I m sharing you link  http://indianculture.gov.in/rarebooks/ain-i-akbari-vol-ii. Please visit page no. 376 122.177.96.184 (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Battles involving the Pratihara Empire has been nominated for merging
Category:Battles involving the Pratihara Empire has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Sikh military has been nominated for renaming
Category:Sikh military has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Early modern history of Bengal has been nominated for merging
Category:Early modern history of Bengal has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Imperial Roman military personnel has been nominated for deletion
Category:Imperial Roman military personnel has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Imperial Roman soldiers has been nominated for merging
Category:Imperial Roman soldiers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Imperial Roman generals has been nominated for merging
Category:Imperial Roman generals has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Imperial Roman admirals has been nominated for merging
Category:Imperial Roman admirals has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military of the Maratha Empire


A tag has been placed on Category:Military of the Maratha Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit  14:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)