User talk:KirstyBirch

Image source problem with Image:Exel Logo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Exel Logo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. HermesBot 14:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Exel Computer Systems plc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. High on a tree 09:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Article
It doesn't appear to be notable, therefore it isn't for Wikipedia. -- John Reaves 15:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Exel Computer Systems plc and EFACS E/8
From your message it seems that there is likely to be problems with your creating these articles. First, read WP:N to see if either article qualifies under our notability guidelines, which requires significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources (read WP:RS to see what that means). Also, read WP:COI our conflict of interest guidelines, and WP:NPOV, our neutral point of view policy. In short, WP is not a resting place for people who are interested in ERP software to see all the vendors or their offerings. It has articles on notable vendors and their notable products only. The articles contain the negative and the positive to maintain a neutral point of view. Articles written by people with conflicts of interest without notability or only discussing the positive features - not the bugs and why the product isn't the best seller - are routinely deleted. Carlossuarez46 16:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

EFACS
A template has been added to the article EFACS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Davidprior 19:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)