User talk:KirtZJ/Archive VI


 * 2010 | Archive I
 * 2011 | Archive II
 * 2012 | Archive III
 * 2013 | Archive IV
 * 2014 | Archive V
 * 2015 | Archive VI
 * 2016 | Archive VII

Message archives for the year of 2015.

List of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation chapters
Just wanted to let you know that I didn't believe that deleting List of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation chapters is uncontroversial, so I removed the CSD tag you placed there. However, I also retargeted the redirect to the section you referenced in the speedy deletion tag: Devil Survivor 2: The Animation, considering that I agree that would be the best target for this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I still say it should be deleted. Other than the influx of recent visits, there was only about 7 views in the last 90 days therefore no one goes to that particular page (redirect or otherwise). The Manga section will not get any larger since its publication ended and there is no reason for yet another spin-off article from an article already spun-off from its related video game counterpart. For these reasons, I feel my deletion proposal was valid. —KirtZ Message 01:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Cross Ange
Hi KirtZJ this is RatedHook. In regard to the message you sent me as for Cross Ange the anime I kinda of don't understand as to what you mean I need a reliable source for it. Currently I have watched the anime all over Crunchyroll and have seen every aspect of it to say from my opinion that it includes the following three: Mecha, Action, and Romance. I will add again in the action and romance but if you feel I am wrong please fill free to message me. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RatedHook (talk • contribs) 00:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Simply watching a series and inferring your own assumptions constitutes to original research and is not acceptable on Wikipedia. I suggest reading this page to learn about citations. At any rate, do not discuss genre changes to Cross Ange on my talk page. Instead do at Talk:Cross Ange. —KirtZ Message 00:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

So in order to add the genre changes we need to cite the following two if we want to add it. Got it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RatedHook (talk • contribs) 01:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

No Game No Life Reversion
Just want to ask a question about the Reversion of my edit on the No Game No Life page.

Besides the fact that it's a GAN, was there any other reason for not having No Game No Life conform to the other anime pages layouts? --Sprchr (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I reverted on good faith. I don't believe there was any strict ruling on how A&M pages should be laid out. GAN and above tend to get better layouts than other pages though. Feel free to inquire over here if you want. —KirtZ Message 00:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There is a layout for Anime and Manga related pages, however you are right that there is no strict ruling, although, in my personal opinion, it would be better for the article to conform a little bit more then it currently is (and yes, I know my opinion does not take priority in this situation) --Sprchr (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Pokemon Season 18
No it's okay you got it right. It did come back for a new season. I know it's the same but you got it right. So you can you put it for Season 18.--Funnycoolman (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed. My main concern is the title of the articles should they be actually split. —KirtZ Message 15:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I replied to you on Cychoidbomb's page where to replied to me about my "mess" (how silly of you to say that) and I don't know if you'll go back and get it so I'm going to reply it here as well on your page as I assume you check this thing a lot. No need to start a new section about Pokémon Season 18 so I'll post it in this section. Anyway, excuse me but what I did was nothing more of a mess than what you're doing. How dare you criticize me and then not even read any of the discussion that should have you think otherwise on this with how you're all "too long didn't read" remark. You're being silly here. If anything what I did was a good faith edit and you should be very proud of me I came up with the proper solution for this thing. Like I told your friend Cyberpower on his page, perhaps I should have started a discussion but I didn't think to do one. I saw there was a problem with how this was to be handled and I immediately jumped in to solve it in perhaps the best way possible. Both seasons have the same title and the fact that they're different seasons show they should have separate pages. You can't get a "Season 18" table by itself on the main page if it's on the same page as Season 17. I was only trying to be helpful and did was perhaps the best idea to handle this two by having a Season 1 and 2 label of XY and you just bring me down and spit at me. Shame. - Jabrona (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * All I can say is that I'm sorry that's how you feel. No harm was meant. I explained your error on the XY talk page. The titular naming scheme was wrong. —KirtZ Message 12:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Brackets and actors
I originally removed the brackets and actor names, since few other film articles didn't have them either. I was somewhat confused. But what about the article of the second Persona 3 film? Should the brackets and actor be written there as well? This time I don't act before asking advice from someone. CAJH (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * They should be included as plaintext only. —KirtZ Message 20:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The word "plaintext" is little hard to understand. I don't really know how it is explained in my mother language which isn't English. CAJH (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that was a bad word choice. I meant you can include the VA's in normal text without wikilinks, like P3M1. —KirtZ Message 14:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hi ummm, I am Chezzelsl and I would like to ask if my information is wrong? And why you would delete all of my add ons? I feel kind of frustrated as I spent 1 hour doing Tonari No Kaibutsu Kun add on and Ao Haru Ride add ons. If there is a problem please say it to me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chezzelsl (talk • contribs) 03:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry but the majority of the content you included was related to each character's relationship status and is not important enough to be mentioned. Things like these are generally not added and removed from character descriptions since they can constitute to original research which is frowned upon. Feel free to add general information but I think most of them are complete enough. —KirtZ Message 08:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

World Trigger edit reversion
Hey, just want a little clarification on the World Trigger edit reversion. Since "mainstream" TV show pages count aired episodes only, even if the full season episode count is known (Better Call Saul, Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), I was wondering why this doesn't seem to apply for anime. Any insight would be helpful. Bcdefg123 (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)


 * As far as I've seen, articles falling under the scope of the anime and manga project have the total count listed where available. —KirtZ Message 20:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

"minor fix"
Could you please be more descriptive of the change you're making? "Minor fix" looks like you're vandalizing (which I have verified multiple times now that you aren't). The correct way to indicate a minor fix is to use the checkbox in the save screen, which you seem to know how to do. --Izno (talk) 03:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

MVM
Hi, one supposes that if MVM Entertainment shouldn't have a release list (looks too much like advertising), then neither should Anime Limited, and would then at least make Anime Limited entry consistent with MVM and Manga Entertainment ? EzraJones (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. These pages should have prose that describe the companies, not a huge list of what they distribute. You can find those on their websites. —KirtZ Message 09:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Pokémon: XY episodes (part 2)
I corrected the Japan premiere date to November 6, 2014 in the sentence, "The season premiered in Japan on November 6, 2014 on TV Tokyo" to match the Japan release date for the episode, "Pokémon: Mega Evolution Special II" and where it states the original run, "November 6, 2014 - ongoing." I also corrected the Japan episode number to 864 for the episode titled "Protect the Future of Science! The Labyrinth of Electricity!!" Before I corrected the Japan episode number to 864 for this episode, it was listed as Japan episode number 865. This does not make sense to me because the previous Japan episode number is listed as 863. Japan episode number 863 is for the episode "Battle in the Wilderness! Fight Numera!!" If this previous Japan episode number 863 is correct then which Pokemon episode is Japan episode number 864? I also corrected the Japan episode numbers for the Pokemon episodes that came after "Protect the Future of Science! The Labyrinth of Electricity!!" Pokemon episode "A Fork in the Road of Indecisiveness!? Musashi and Sonansu!!" is Japan episode number 865. Pokemon episode "Fokko VS Mahoxy! A Splendid Performance Battle!! is 866. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchu3wiki (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I saw the typos. Sorry. —KirtZ Message 15:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

OreGairu
Hi, KirtZJ. I changed your edit, so could you please check on List of My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU episodes (season 2)? If you do so, I'll say it is hard to find words to express my gratitude. --Infinite0694 (talk) 09:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * @ Sorry for the late reply. Nice work on the start. I'll get to the page once I finish cleaning up S1. Could you please provide me with the source for the episode titles? Thanks. —KirtZ Message 18:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops, I forgot to add the reference. According to Megami Magazine vol.180(issued on mar 30, 2015), it can be confirmed.--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. From my experience though, in some cases episode titles published in magazine form before they air can be subjected to change. —KirtZ Message 19:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

An opinion
Do you have an opinion about recent edits? After seeing I gave a 3RR warning but it is bothering me that the user is using an IP to edit war. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * @ That is clearly disruptive behavior and since the IP belongs to the user in question then I would consider that a direct violation of 3RR in being an obvious attempt to game the system. I must say that after merely observing, I am a bit disappointed in how this user has conducted themselves, this includes some of the content they have included in articles. Some users on the project have tried to help this user during their multiple posts on WT:A&M and I have seen no effort on their part to take any of the advice that has been offered. At the same time, the proposal that Doorknob has been trying to advertise on their recent edit war is clearly spam. Wikipedia already has a bunch of tools that new users can use to help them create articles, which I don't believe they have found. If this keeps up I would suggest seeking administrator advice at an appropriate talk page because this kind of disruption really can't continue. —Kirt Message 02:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with you and will do. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Relevant discussion is here: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Archdjinni of the Rings Hoopa promotional poster.png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Archdjinni of the Rings Hoopa promotional poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:A Letter to Momo#Good article push
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:A Letter to Momo. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Persona 3 The Movie: No. 4, Last Episode for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persona 3 The Movie: No. 4, Last Episode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persona 3 The Movie: No. 4, Last Episode until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Some words or you.
- It's Hikigaya Hachiman and not Hikkigaya Hachiman. Hikki is the nickname given to Hachiman, don't combine them with his real name. Hikkigaya has no meaning, you know?

- Unreliable source, eh? Now, it has been proven that the episode title I put before is true.


 * The first bit was an obvious typo. That happens, you know? As for the second bit. Future events predicted by an unverifiable source, and published on fan-websites hardly receive any type of validation on Wikipedia if they remain unverifiable. At the same time, fan-sources hold no merit on Wikipedia. A lot of the times print-magazine sources get it wrong. It's best for the information to be accurate. If that means waiting and not jumping the gun, so be it. —Kirt Message 17:20, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

---

- The fact that you keep repeating the exact same mistakes, it was no longer typos.

- Doesn't change the fact that my edits were true. The titles were on the excerpt given on the website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.25.214.52 (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Sigh. Believe what you want. It really isn't my fault if you fail to understand Wikipedia guidelines based on the explanation presented. Have a nice day. —Kirt Message 15:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Eureka Seven articles
I've contacted about this matter here. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks. —Kirt Message 10:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Fairy Tail seasons 3 and 6 DVD covers
I've been notified that the Japanese DVD covers for season 3 and season 6 of the Fairy Tail anime have been changed from File:Fairy Tail DVD 19.jpg to File:Fairy Tail DVD volume 22 cover.png and File:Fairy Tail DVD 38.jpg to File:Fairy Tail DVD volume 44 cover.jpg, respectively. As a result, the original images have been orphaned and due for deletion. It was my understanding that the cover of the first DVD set containing episodes for each season was to be used for each article. I don't know if that's the proper way to do it, but what is the reason behind the use of the current DVD covers, other than that each change was a "fix"? User:Immblueversion (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @ - I'm not sure there was ever a general decision that explicitly stated that the first disc covers of the season should be used. Most FL/GA's on the project tend to use covers which display the most characters rather than the first issue of media (manga or disc). With that being said, I decided to use the appropriate covers from each "season" which featured the most characters on the front. —Kirt Message 04:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! For the second bit, I didn't do much (yet) on Expelled from Paradise if that's what you are referring. —Kirt Message 01:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:A.D. Vision#B-Class?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:A.D. Vision. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * @ - I may be able to help some with Section23 if you're starting work there. I'm not all that familiar with ADV as a company. —Kirt Message 01:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Seraph of the End
When in "Seraph of the End" you look for reception of volume 3 or 5 you will have hard time noticing it because 1, 2 and 4 are in a straight line at the most left of the text, that why I thought that an exception of the usual was in place to make it easier on the eye, but you are of course right that in general it's in a single line general SpaceWalker189 (talk) 22:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * These sections are written in a prose format, not lists. It's probably a bit hard to follow because of the kind of sentences used but I would assume most people don't have a problem. Feel free to rewrite the section if you want. —Kirt Message 22:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

P2 reply
In response to your question, I was doing that because I'm using their western covers: it just happens that Eternal Punishment could not be localized. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Sword Art Online
Sorry, I don't know what happened there, I thought I was reverting the vandalism myself!--122.111.244.201 (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright, no worries. —Kirt Message 04:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Here comes the discuss part of BRD
Common name does say how it is commonly named, but I believe that has its limits too. The season has been named "Kalos Quest".—cyberpower  Chat:Online 17:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Nobody says Kalos Quest. That's only how digital retailers want to list it. Alternatively, iTunes isn't the series' official distributor. We should wait for a disc release like the other Pokemon seasons. If those distributors want to name disc releases under KQ, we'll have to go with that. —Kirt Message 17:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute. iTunes only releases content the way the distributor wants it to be released.  They draw up a monetary contract, provide Apple with the series info and artwork.  The logo was uploaded from the artwork.  Essentially iTunes is just as good as a disc.—cyberpower  Chat:Offline 04:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * @ Sorry for the late reply. Viz Media is the official distributor of Pokemon while iTunes is just a retailer. If Viz decides to use KQ for the next release after this one we'll remove the part 1/2 and go with XY and KQ respectively. Based on them calling it Set 1 though, its a 50/50 chance that might happen. For now the common name takes precedence.  —Kirt Message 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok.—cyberpower Chat:Limited Access 02:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Pokémon: XY episodes (part 2)
Why was the Pokémon episode for "Pikachu Becomes a Star!? Its Movie Debut!!" "How to Pikachu the Movie! Ready! Action!!" The Thunderclap Hero! Super Pikachu!! Pikachu's Thrilling Blooper Award removed from the wiki page? The Pokémon episode for "Pikachu Becomes a Star!? Its Movie Debut!!" "How to Pikachu the Movie! Ready! Action!!" The Thunderclap Hero! Super Pikachu!! Pikachu's Thrilling Blooper Award aired on the same day as the Pokémon episode for The Pokémon Sky Relay Challenge! Fly, Onbat!!, which is June 18, 2015. This Pokémon episode would be considered a side story episode just like the Pokémon episodes for The Strongest Mega Evolution: Act II and The Strongest Mega Evolution: Act III. Why are the Pokémon episodes for The Strongest Mega Evolution: Act II and The Strongest Mega Evolution: Act III on the wiki page and not removed from it?

Was it because there was no official reference attached to the episode title from the TV Tokyo Japanese website? Was the Pokémon episode for "Pikachu Becomes a Star!? Its Movie Debut!!" "How to Pikachu the Movie! Ready! Action!!" The Thunderclap Hero! Super Pikachu!! Pikachu's Thrilling Blooper Award formatted or referenced the wrong way? If not then what are your reasons for removing the Pokémon episode for "Pikachu Becomes a Star!? Its Movie Debut!!" "How to Pikachu the Movie! Ready! Action!!" The Thunderclap Hero! Super Pikachu!! Pikachu's Thrilling Blooper Award from the wiki page? --BCC3wiki 01:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The Pokemon lists are poorly maintained. Special episodes unrelated to the story should go here. The Strongest Mega Evolution is part of the story hence listed where appropriate. —Kirt Message 01:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Pokemon XY (Send back)
Don't worry. I know what I'm doing. Besides I'm only adding the title and air date that's all. Not translating the info. Not trying to change the page on purpose. Besides what's the point of a source when we know what episode airs on weekends?--Funnycoolman (talk) 01:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * None of that is exempt from WP:FUTURE. The point is if you don't have a reliable and verifiable source you have to wait. Wikipedia is different from Wikia in that information can not be indiscriminately included just because you think it is going to happen. —Kirt Message 01:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime ang manga#Airdates again: It's time to standardize them once and for all
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Regarding SNAFU episode list
On the List of My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU episodes (season 2) can you move the airdate references to the Refs column since you have the latter? Also in the airdates footnote, can you mention the example for April 2 and (April 1 or 3)? AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * @ I've been using the title format from Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebellion and Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebellion R2 FLs for awhile. I don't think there's an issue with the column header looking the same as the actual episode listing in terms of English on top followed by Japanese at the bottom. As for the references, I put the airdate refs next to the actual dates to separate them from the general references in the Ref column for quick access. Ideally I would have liked them to be unified like the S1 references, but I can't find a case like that. Lastly, doesn't the footnote stating that "the episodes technically aired the days following the ones listed." mean the same thing? —Kirt Message 02:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon the Series XY Sets, Volume 1 cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon the Series XY Sets, Volume 1 cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Diabolik Lovers Video Game Cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Diabolik Lovers Video Game Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Black Clover
Why not just redirect it to Weekly Shōnen Jump? The series was published in English so it could be is a likely search term. Looking at the page view stats, Black Clover has generated an average of over 100 views prior to the AfD note added. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm okay with that. Although, given the recent behavior of the creator and another major contributor I didn't want to risk an edit war with them once their block expires. —Kirt Message 14:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I would take that up at the right venues then, deleting the article also wont stop the same people from re-creating it. I suggest WP:ANI and/or WP:RFP once it is a redirect. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have the time to get into debacles right now or (or the next few months). You have more experience with AfDs than I do, so if you think its worth an uncontroversial redirect then be my guest to do that. —Kirt Message 14:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I understand and sorry if I made you feel pressured. I will let the AfD run it's course, no harm done if it is redirected anyways through that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries. I have to go. I'll see how this plays out later. —Kirt Message 14:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Satoko Kiyuduki Notability
You recently added a notability flag to Satoko Kiyuduki. I wrote about why I thought the article subject was sufficiently notable on the talk page, if you think it's not reasonable could you comment on specific problems there? --Polm23 (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I added a more thorough justification at the AfD, would appreciate it if you would weigh in again. --Polm23 (talk) 03:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Prods
I didn't want to but I undid your edits, try redirecting the articles or AfD. Its not going to be worth waiting for days only for an admin to decline the prods in the end *sigh*. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I already knew that. It seemed utterly ridiculous to me that even though the edit was suspicious, it could be undone the very second before deletion no questions asked with no changes made. Thanks anyway. —Kirt Message 02:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with you, if you know an admin I would ask for his/her advice on this one maybe the articles would stand a chance at a Prod. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Persona 3 Movies
Hey there, I noticed that you were the editor who brought Persona 3 The Movie: No. 1, Spring of Birth to GA status. First, I'm pleased to read your work. It sort of helped inspire me to bring the main series article to GA. I was wondering whether you were interested in any of the other P3 film articles. I have seen several interviews concerning the later movies appearing on the main site, and have archived them so they can be found again should the site go down. I don't know whether you're still interested in this topic, but I just wanted to let you know your work has inspired others and that it may be possible to do similar work on the other articles. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the words Drake. I've been busy as of late so I haven't been editing as much. I had hoped to push the others up to a GA standard however it was brought to my attention that Falling Down and Winter of Rebirth were in fact not quite notable when the latter was nominated for AfD (albeit under a promotional title) a short while ago. Regardless, I have been working on Winter of Rebirth in a separate doc outside of Wikipedia until I have acquired enough sources to stave off a potential encore AfD. —Kirt Message 04:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
—cyberpower Chat:Limited Access 02:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Kalos Quest
It doesn't get anymore official than this when Pokemon themselves are endorsing the name. —cyberpower  Chat:Online 01:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dog &#38; Scissors Light Novel Cover Volume 1.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Dog &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kōtetsujō no Kabaneri Teaser Poster.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Kōtetsujō no Kabaneri Teaser Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)