User talk:Kirti 1102

Welcome to Wikipedia. But...
...I've added the "" template to your user page (User:Kirti 1102), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).

Please note that the purpose of a user page is not as personal homepage or used as a general webhosting service, but as way for active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. If you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues here or on my user talk page. You may remove the deletion notice, and the page will not be deleted for the moment, but note that it may still be sent to Miscellany for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Calton | Talk 07:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Public Administration Review
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Public Administration Review, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0033-3352. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blue revolution


The article Blue revolution has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable and unreferenced neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bhupen Hazarika 300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Bhupen Hazarika 300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 23:19, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Babri Mosque Please Help
Thank you for making corrections to this article. I wrote the architectural section of the article which I found vandalised. My article had been there for four years withouth change and had stood the test of time. But then somebody keeps removing paragraphs recently. Please keep an eye on this work. I have restored it to the point 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which are the last of my three edits. I have also put back a photograph of the Mosque. I do not get involved in the politics of the dispute, I only write on architecture of old monuments both Jewish Hindu and Muslim in India and elsewhere. But as a architect i say again I only intrested in architecture of monuments and not the politics of the dispute. I would be very grateful if you can keep an eye on my article (architectural sections) and revert to 22:43, 26 November 2009 79.77.139.65 which is the original for comparison. I originally wrote the article (architectural section, cooling system, well) in 2006 and it keeps getting vandalised only recently as the Mosque has been in the Indian news. Of Course I welcome and would be very happy if the section was improved by a fellow wikipedian with an interest in architecture of religious monuments. 79.77.158.185 (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kamlesh Dutt Tripathi


The article Kamlesh Dutt Tripathi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. W a c k y Wace talk 13:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University
Hi there. I'm afraid I had to revert your edit from several reasons. First, it introduced a massive amount of external links, none of which complied with WP:EL. I urge you to peruse these guidelines before re-adding them. Second, by changing the Acronym it deals with a future event, and acts as if this event already occurred, against WP:CRYSTAL. Third, and probably least important, you introduced several WP:MOS violations. I would have probably just fixed these if it was the only problem, but as your edit included so much to fix I'm afraid I had to revert it. Feel free to re-introduce proper facts. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vrindavan yojna lucknow


Hello, Kirti 1102. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vrindavan yojna lucknow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)