User talk:Kirtishvyas

September 2023
Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to WordPress have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to WordPress. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks, for letting me know.I thought the content was helpful the first was detail guide on how to start blog which you removed and was addressing the concern in detail and next was detailing about the different hosting types which you also deleted.It is strange Kirtishvyas (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The external link you added to the article is a link spam (blog), not a reliable source. Please read WP:RS and WP:LINKSTOAVOID. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, i have gone through same and found it allow to enter blog links if from authentic source if that is the case then i am a blogger, who has youtube channel around 1.5 lacs sharing content only around blogging you can have a look for channel MR VYAS on youtube channel.Just to clear still i won't be counted authentic source for sahring unique detail? So i will update same to my community in case they wanted to link their experienced well research detail content over here.Awaiting for your kind response. Kirtishvyas (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:USERGENERATED. Annh07 (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying, i won't waste your time Kirtishvyas (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Felida97 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Seawolf35 (talk) 19:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Team,
 * Last edit of mine to wikipedia was to share the google latest and new updates about generative AI experiement and i have linked with google official resounce not mine any blog post. As a contributor i thought it was worth adding in the Search result pages. Here was the official resource,i am not sure what you validated and why you blocked me.Does wikipedia not even allow to link with any authentic souce taht even google blog?
 * Please unblock this account so i can keep contributing to the account.
 * The source i linked was : https://blog.google/products/search/generative-ai-search/ Please consider thsi note and unblock me if you really found that my intention for contribution was genuine. Kirtishvyas (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)