User talk:KishanNaikTiwari

Maharashtra state disputes
Hi. Note that per undue weight, we do not cover in detail each of every possible fact just because sources exist for it. The dispute over Belgaum is already mentioned in the article, see the History section. Regarding Telangana, that maybe deserves a mention but definitely not in this much detail. The rest what you added was unsourced and don't use blogs as references (see reliable sources). -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Maharashtra. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Note: When you make an addition and it is reverted, you should take the disagreement to the article's talkpage, not re-add your addition again. Please see BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC).