User talk:Kitana-Galatea

Speedy deletion of Werewolf Order
A tag has been placed on Werewolf Order requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 03:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hell House of Hollywood
A tag has been placed on Hell House of Hollywood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 16:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Szandora LaVey
A tag has been placed on Szandora LaVey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 19:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Demons of the Flesh: A Complete Guide to Left-Hand Path Sex Magic
A tag has been placed on Demons of the Flesh: A Complete Guide to Left-Hand Path Sex Magic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Demons of the Flesh: A Complete Guide to Left-Hand Path Sex Magic and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 14:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Gerald Gardner bio
The bio you added for Gardner, while amusing, cites outdated and discredited information. Aidan Kelly's stuff, for instance, flagrantly misquotes the source documents left, right and centre, even inventing whole passages in order to paint Gardner as a pervert. As well as little inventions like blaming the English public school system for giving Gardner a spanking fetish when Gardner didn't attend school! Kelly is hardly considered a scholar. Also, Hutton's theories have been superseded by Philip Heselton's books. True, secret societies weren't that secret, which is how Heselton has figured out who a good number of the New Coven folks probably were, and given substantial detail about their occult interests and interactions. Hutton's evidence in comparison is weak, measly and disordered. So, yes your little editorial was funny, but it hardly makes the point you intended, because it's just plain wrong... I suggest you do a bit of reading and come back to it. Fuzzypeg★ 11:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Not only that, but it was also a completely plagiarised piece.--Vidkun (talk) 14:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I see you're recycling exactly the same text again, presumably for no other purpose than disruption. Fuzzypeg★ 22:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Satanic baptism
I have nominated Satanic baptism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Satanic baptism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Closedmouth (talk) 09:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)