User talk:Kitcatx/Archives/ 1

Please Assume good faith
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not do on Communion and Liberation. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ''If you have been editing Wikipedia long enough to know what vandalism is, you have been editing Wikipedia long enough to know that a content dispute, even a content dispute in which the other editor is completely wrong, is not vandalism. Continuing to refer to the edits of another editor as vandalism is a personal attack and may result in a block.'' Robert McClenon (talk) 01:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Perfect okay, understood =)) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Creating talk page archives
Please do not archive complete talk pages. Please leave at least the last few months content as it may still be relevant. Only archive sufficient text to render the page relatively easy to navigate, nothing more. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks =)) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  19:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Oscar Pistorius, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  00:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You were warned above about removing or archiving entire Talk pages. Stop now please.  General Ization  Talk  00:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Joe Son.  General Ization Talk  00:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


 * My mistake sorry, peace Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  00:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Once is a mistake. Do it again and it will be either incompetence or vandalism.  General Ization  Talk  00:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I won't do it anymore, I promise sorry again, best regards :)) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  00:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Società Italiana per Condotte d’Acqua moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Società Italiana per Condotte d’Acqua, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks, the page has been regenerated since a week and re-edited, it's much better now =) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Lawtheagoraphobic, Greetings I have just checked there is no changes since I last edit - see HERE. You content need to support by independent, reliable sources (secondary independent sources). Thank you. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 01:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks I'm willing to improve it! =) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  20:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rugby Clube Montemor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rugby_Clube_Montemor check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rugby_Clube_Montemor?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll pay more attention next time =) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  09:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
I'll do thanks. See you on March 2019! Thanks :) Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  07:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Archiving Talk Pages
Hello. Please stop archiving talk pages that do not need it, such as Talk:Liz Fraser. At Help:Archiving a talk page, the lead states "It is customary to periodically archive old discussions on a talk page when that page becomes too large." Hers was far from it. Thank you. —  Wylie pedia  @ 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your email

 * I'm not sure why you sent me an email asking to be unblocked when outlined the Standard Offer above, which you agreed to.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Lawtheagoraphobic, keep in mind that you're still free to edit Simple English Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikidata, etc. You can use English on all those projects.  There's also Wikipedia in other languages.  Those would be good places to edit if you want to establish a reputation for being a good editor.  It will also give you something to do if you're bored. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Standard Offer Request by the Interested Wikipedian

 * If unblocked, what edits will you be looking to do? I will be honest however, just saying "it's six months, unblock me" is not a very convincing reason to unblock you. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

 * Hi User:RickinBaltimore, thanks for reaching out, I'd like to make constructive edits on Economical and Political WP Articles. Thanks again for asking, have a good day Sir. Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  23:41, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * As the blocking admin, how would you feel about unblocking this user? It appears they have refrained from socking, and this appears to be a good faith effort to return. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see an issue as long as they adhere to a single account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This user is seeking a rename. Does it look okay for you to rename this account with such a restriction? Sometimes people request renames in an attempt to avoid scrutiny or hide previous bad conducts. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 14:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. Lawtheagoraphobic, if your account is renamed, do you intend to include that information on your user page (for example, using Template:User previous account or similar)?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nope, thanks for asking tho. Lawtheagoraphobic  (talk)  20:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * In that case I see this an an end-run on your single account restriction and would not support a rename.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * To add, I realize that my lack of support doesn't actually prevent a rename, but I do find it extremely worrisome when a former indef-blocked account requests a new username as their first edit outside of userspace, and they explicitely reject linking the accounts in anyway, especially when there are restrictions on the account. There were many concerns with the edits made by your previous accounts, including edit warring and copyright violations. I'm not confident that you should be attempting a clean start (which your username change request implies) given your history and extremely recent unblock.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with with respect to this editor's past record. Without even digging deep into their other accounts, the recent block history as well as a request to rename right after conditional unblock particularly raises a red flag. While there is no technical limitation in renaming this specific account, renamers are bound by a number of rules and are expected to make judgments regarding if a rename would potentially make it easy for the editor to hide previous misbehavior or otherwise evade sanctions. In this case I see these as barrier to renaming and have therefore rejected the request. -★-  PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 22:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 14:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Let me know if is okay now PlyrStar93, thanks much appreciated. Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  17:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The username you chose looks fine; can you also follow up with Ponyo's question in the above section (do you intend to use a statement such as template User previous account to indicate your old username)? -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 17:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

I prefer it's not indicated, thanks PlyStar93. Lawtheagoraphobic  (talk)  20:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 4)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lawtheagoraphobic/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lawtheagoraphobic/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lawtheagoraphobic/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drewmutt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Lawtheagoraphobic/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  20:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm sorry, I have messed the sandbox doing my editing experiments. Lawtheagoraphobic   (talk)  08:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your username change
I find it fairly disingenuous that you failed to mention that your previous CHU request was objected to by the blocking admin (me) and previously declined by when you made your new CHU request. I'm sure that was unaware of the concerns regarding your checkuser block and the unblock condition of sticking to a single account. At this time there are many links in the history that point back to your previous username; please ensure you don't make any efforts to obfuscate them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pinging me to this discussion Ponyo. I wasn't aware about the condition. Could you please mention your old username on userpage using Template:User previous account? &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi everybody, I've added the userbox mentioning my old username in my userpage. I won't obfuscate any links pointing to my old Username, thanks! Kitcatx   (talk)  12:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that alleviates my concerns.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Duferco moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Duferco, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. Almost all of the sources are primary sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 12:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks. Kitcatx   (talk)  18:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Kitcatx/sandbox


Hello, Kitcatx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Duferco concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Duferco, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Duferco


Hello, Kitcatx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Duferco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Italian Data Protection Authority moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Italian Data Protection Authority, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Italian Data Protection Authority
Hello, Kitcatx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Italian Data Protection Authority, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)