User talk:Kitchen Knife/Archive 2

User:Ghmyrtle
It is my belief the Mhytle is one of the most dangerous types of user on WikiPedia. Someone with an agenda who denies it. There are various types of POV warrior and he is amongst the worst. He is a persistent vandal Wikipedia would do well to remove him completely.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I did quickly investigate this, having had no interactions with Ghmyrtle before, but I did not see it. As the above is a personal attack if unsubstantiated, can you please provide some evidence which confirms that Ghmyrtle is a POV warrior and not just someone who disagrees with you?  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 15:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well ask him why he keeps removing references to the exclusion of the Met Counties by the Flag Institute? Their own statement can have no other meaning?--Kitchen Knife (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh and by the way I tried to start discusions [] and [] and

I believe he has answered that question at Talk:Flag Institute. I see that the two of you disagree on this matter, and that's all well and good - get more people in with an WP:RFC and discuss it at that page. That does not make him a POV warrior nor editing with an agenda, just that he and you hold different opinions. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 15:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If he has answered it, then he has had plenty of other opportunities to do it, but didn't tale it.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 17:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * If you think a particular user is causing a long-term problem, you should draft a request for comment about it. Edit warring is always the wrong thing to do. By the way, I'm yanking your email access for the duration of this block as you are using it disruptively. There is also a limit to the number of times you will be allowed to appeal here, and I would say you are right up against it, so your next request is probably the "make or break" one. You may want to take a bit more time composing it. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Now patronizing is only allowed by Admins as well, but then of course your is non destructive patronizing.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's actually pretty good advice, patronizing or not, you are free to take or leave it as you see fit. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Removed talk page access.
I have removed your talk page access because you are abusing it to make accusations against others instead of addressing the reason for your block and requesting unblock. If you wish to appeal the block, you can send an email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org or arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Please see the block appeal procedures before contacting the committee.--v/r - TP 20:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

RE: E-mail
Please refrain from making false accusations because that doesn't help you achieve anything. -- B  music  ian  00:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:DutchSceenShot.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DutchSceenShot.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Isochronous's interwikis
Sorry, you're wrong. Isochronous, cs:Isochronie and de:Isochronie are desambiguation pages, but es:Isocrona, eo:Izokroneco, it:Isocronismo and Изохронность колебаний are not. I removed the incorrect interwikis. Regards, --Metrónomo (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Sea Odyssey: Giants Spectacular
May be of interest! Martinevans123 (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Ta.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rly gds stn
Template:Rly gds stn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 12:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Waterspaces?
. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure some of the Merseyrail edits have the same flavour but different language to waterspaces.Kitchen Knife (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aintree Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:AN/I
You have been reported to WP:AN/I for disruptive behavior. Please desist from further editing of the conflicted articles until this is resolved by a non-interested third party, thank you.Camelbinky (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I will not "go away". please do not edit at the disputed articles until a decision is made by the administrators at WP:AN/I.Camelbinky (talk) 14:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It has already been discussed in NOR and you basically lost the argument badly and hoped that by waiting a long time before reverting you vandalism would go unnoticed. You have demonstrated you parochial POV, you have edited under IP numebr to disguise your reverts. You are a vandal and a bully.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Higher National Diploma
Hi, Thanks for correcting my oversight on the typo correction, appreciate it. :) Audit Guy (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Altering talk page discussions
Hi, four times now you have altered discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains in such a way as to break the layout of subsequent threads. In the first and third, you altered  to  ; in the second and fourth, you altered   to   - in each case, valid HTML was changed to invalid. Please could you avoid doing that? -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I hadn't noticed. I'm not sure what is doing it, but it is not deliberate. It may be a grammar checker I have installed but that shouldn't be editing things without my permission and I haven't given it.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 13:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It was not the Grammar checker but wikEd which I had turned off as being dangerously slow only after doing the edits. Do not remember switching it on.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, I left a report at WT:WIKED; they'll probably want to know which browser that you're using. -- Red rose64 (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I only see two instances of this in those linked diffs, and . The other two are issues that were cause by the issues in the two linked in this comment and wouldn't have happened otherwise (or it would have done it in 1 & 3)... Are we sure this isn't another parsoid issue?  I'll wait until  comments before I speculate much further... — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 19:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Kichen Knife, what's with those last two edits to the same project talk page, where you first delete someone's post at the end of a thread and then multiple subsequent threads, and then insert a string of gibberish? What's going on? Yngvadottir (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Kitchen Knife, if you are performing tests, the best thing to do is to copy some text to User:Kitchen Knife/sandbox and do your tests there. Otherwise it looks like you are committing vandalism. Also give an edit summary to explain what you are doing. --  Dr Greg   talk  16:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Gambier Terrace
Thank you for reversing Editiationist's alteration. Editationist is a pest, systematically reversing other my edits as well (see "Canning, Liverpool"). In the case of Canning, his aim seems to be to make the area seem as grandiose and expensive as possible, so perhaps he is an estate agent. In some cases his aim is unfathomable - why delete a warning that a referenced website is no longer maintained, for example? I don't know much about how Wiki works, can anything be done about such vexatious editors? Tdls (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * They can be reported at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring though they may have to get worse before anything is done. There is also COI. See the section on User COnduct at the top of the page.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Since you are knowledgeable about Canning, perhaps you could add something to the relevant article, to provide a third opinion so it isn't just him versus me. Your decision of course. 62.194.196.92 (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops, that last comment was from me. I'd forgotten to log in. Tdls (talk) 06:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Free-turbine turboshaft
Fix it then. Don't just write an un-necessary article which would be better covered in Turboshaft. Wikipedia may be a free to edit encyclopedia, but it still demands common sense.--Petebutt (talk) 09:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time Crashers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keith Allen and Chris Ramsey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Time Crashers
Just dropping this note as a courtesy FYI: I have added some STUB tags and some talkpage comments on the article that you created for Time Crashers. I think this sounds like an interesting show, reminiscent of The 1900 House, and I wish there was a way to watch it outside the UK. Koala Tea Of Mercy ( KTOM's Articulations &amp; Invigilations ) 17:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * There is http://www.my-expat-network.com/uk/ C4 will have it on their catchup service 4od.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Novelist spelling
Thanks for the correction but I don't understand your edit summary of "No it isn't. There was a hourse were it was spelt with a double l, but tat is it." Hourse?? Thanks, Dismas |(talk) 22:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Parks and commons in Sefton has been nominated for discussion
Category:Parks and commons in Sefton, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Adams' Grammar School page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=731087995 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F731087995%7CAdams' Grammar School%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Francis Mott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redhill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Merseyrail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Tasmanian devil page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=738963451 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F738963451%7CTasmanian devil%5D%5D Ask for help])

Including traditional/historic counties as a point of reference.
Hello Kitchen Knife,

Please advise why my edits were reverted? They were most certainly not vandalism! There is nothing wrong whatsoever in stating that a place is in one or straddles two or more traditional counties. The fact that they are not (and in some places never) used for administrative purposes but remain as geographical points of reference especially as Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP announced traditional counties can be used and should be promoted. The edits I made only added this info and it still clearly stated new metropolitan areas were now used for local government, which is totally separate from the traditional and historic counties.

Can you please reinstate my edits?

Andrew Donaldson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DonaldsonAC (talk • contribs) 21:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Propaganda? Vandalism? Stating facts actually, I wrote it last night in work, no idea what you are referring to, you might be happy to see misinformation perpetuated while the heritage of the country is meddled with. Eric Pickles spoke about this last year so how come you lot so vehemently opposed to any mention of the traditional counties?

You are nothing but little Nazis who think you are the be all and end all, well you will see. You are a snotty cunt who can't handle facts. It's well known how Wikipedia is hardly gospel fact, and now I see why, when the WikiStasi stifle actual facts being added. I will desist you, cretin! LØL
 * yawn.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Zircon (missile), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please see WP:V and WP:OR. Speculation has no place on Wikipedia.'' &mdash;  MB laze Lightning T 07:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Zircon (missile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netkous-viaduct


The article Netkous-viaduct has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * I have been working on articles about The Hague public transport and found this article to be a largely translated version of Netkous (Den Haag) in nlwiki. Does it need sources like any other article does, or should it just be deleted as pure original research?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. « « «  SOME GADGET GEEK  » » » (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Gstnlnk


A tag has been placed on Template:Gstnlnk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Useddenim (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scally (slang)


The article Scally (slang) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is more or less a dictionary definition, and Wikipedia is not simply for the purpose of defining terms. I note that the page Scallie was deleted at AfD, which appeared to cover the same topic, but I have no way of knowing whether it is a simple repost of the same material."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mondo Beer (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Please see my proposal to speedily rename a category

 * Category:Liverpool murder cases to Category:People murdered in Liverpool Hugo999 (talk) 08:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Common Gateway Interface revert
Hi Kitchen Knife,

Re your revert of my revert of your edit

"WHat is a 'normal system'"

E.g., one that conforms to the Linux Foundation's Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, which states that "There must be no subdirectories in /usr/bin."

Referring to  implies that   is a subdirectory, rather than a shell command. See Env and the sites it links to.

"the unmodified snippet of code does not work on my Ubuntu system."

There are various reasons that might happen. What error message do you get?

"The modified version does."

That's odd. When I try, I get

What do you get for ?

Jmdyck (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * My applogise sould have been "#!/usr/bin/python3" no space. There was in the orginal. The other problem was the print, this just doesn't work on my machine should be print('')to # Leave a blank line. --Kitchen Knife (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * is valid, but so is . So the space in the original was fine. E.g., see this StackOverflow question or this StackExchange item.
 * As for  not working on your machine, it should. See the official Python3 docs where it says "If no objects are given, print will just write end." In what way does it not work? Do you get an error message? --Jmdyck (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It looks like IDE I was using was pulling up Python2 which just puts out for this. I'd keep with the '' in it seem a lot more sensible and will work with Python2. I was using the code to simply verify that me WebServer was working before going onto write a small support file.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, so after all that, do you agree that (a) the script was valid before your edit, (b) your edit introduced an error, so (c) I was justified in reverting your edit? --Jmdyck (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * if it means so much to you, then yes.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Norwich reverts
Hello I noticed you just reverted a couple of edits I made on Norwich. I made a much needed edit in the form of the so called largest city after London section mainly rest I'm not so bothered about. You are contradicting the established fact that Birmingham is the second largest city in England after london followed by Manchester and Leeds. Norwich isnt the second largest city. It's not established other than through a book when Birmingham is recognized as the second largest city by the UK Government. So I'm reverting your edit on that part. RailwayJG (talk) 22:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PerseyMig-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PerseyMig-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:European Computers has been nominated for renaming
Category:European Computers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:German computers has been nominated for splitting
Category:German computers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)