User talk:Kitsune78

Recent edit to Ann Louise Gittleman
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Ann Louise Gittleman article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Coretheapple (talk) 19:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

An extended welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ann Louise Gittleman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''Hi, I noticed you removed well-sourced content that is critical of the psueodoscience that Ann Louise Gittleman has been advocating and profiting from. Please remember that WP adheres to a neutral point of view backed up by reliable sources. Since you have been warned once before about problems sticking to this policy, I am marking down a level 2 warning here.'' Delta13C (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)