User talk:Kitty9992

See also: User talk:Kitty53/Archive 1, User talk:Kitty53/Archive 2

ja:利用者‐会話:Kitty53

Remember, if you should ever leave a message, remember these:

WARNING: Please note that if you're going to replace an image with Image:Example.jpg on my userpage, leave a message here instead, because I'm going to count putting an image like that on my user page without permission like that as vandalism.

I have trouble with vulgarity, so no swearing when sending me a message. If I see even ONE swear word in any messages left for me, I will automatically delete that message, whether or not I finished reading it, yet.

P.S.
This is page 3 of my talk page.

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Kitty53! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Lee Seo Jin -
 * 2) Kokoro Kikuchi -
 * 3) Justin Gross -
 * 4) Ai Nagano -

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Notice
Dear Fellow Wikipedia users,

I'm sorry to tell all you Wikipedia users out there that unfortunately, I came down with a bad cold last weekend, and it has been making me feel MISERABLE! Therefore, I may likely edit less often than usual. Sorry. It's very hard for me to think while I am sick, so if I do something by accident when editing an article, and the edit looks sloppy, please let me know. Luckily, I won't get any of you sick. Also, please leave me a message if you need to ask a question or if you would like to say something to me as long as it is nice, because I take rude messages very seriously, especially when I am sick. Thank you for taking the time to read this notice.

Love, Kitty53 (talk) 02:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

BrainPOP
Hi. I notice that you have edited this article in the past. An editor has nominated it for deletion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/BrainPOP_(2nd_nomination)#BrainPOP Feel free to contribute to the AfD discussion. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Removing ref tags
Hi. You appear to be removing a lot of unreffed and ref improve tags from blps. Those tags are neccessary until the sourcing problems are corrected. Removing them is considered disruptive and against policy (if the underlying problem hasn't been fixed) and end up hiding a problem, rather than fixing the problem. Have a look at this recent An/i discussion and this current RFC  for more background.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Kitty53/Akari Hibino
User:Kitty53/Akari Hibino, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kitty53/Akari Hibino and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Kitty53/Akari Hibino during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  06:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Frederick Glaysher
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection (talk) 11:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC) -->

Following the instructions, I'm letting you know of this Deletion Review.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Frederick_Glaysher

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_21

Survey
Hi Kitty53!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maki Saitō


The article Maki Saitō has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very weakly referenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kurepalaku (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
I hope you feel better! Here's some companionship as you recover.

Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 

kitty im illuminati im sorry
hey, im sorry for all i said in halo, dont know if this is you but i was just messing around. lots of love from your friend illuminati

--

moscolosco@hotmail.com

Nomination of Karen Strassman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Strassman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karen Strassman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Doyle Actor
Hello Kitty9992,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peter Doyle Actor for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr RD (talk) 06:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mai Hoshikawa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mai Hoshikawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mai Hoshikawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Mechanikles listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mechanikles. Since you had some involvement with the Mechanikles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kiyotaka Furushima


Hello, Kitty9992. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kiyotaka Furushima".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 09:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Naru Kawamoto
Hello, Kitty9992. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Naru Kawamoto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

DadMom AngryPants listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DadMom AngryPants. Since you had some involvement with the DadMom AngryPants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chiyako Shibahara


A tag has been placed on Chiyako Shibahara, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Orville1974  (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kathryn Feller for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Feller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kathryn Feller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Kamala
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Kamala. 122.171.171.13 (talk) 14:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

"Wild man-eating clam in the backyard" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wild man-eating clam in the backyard. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)