User talk:KittyHawk2015

Welcome!
Hello, KittyHawk2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 13:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Non-free images
Please stop continually adding the image of James D. Griffin to various pages. This image is non-free and the rationale is valid only to use the image on the main James D. Griffin page. It may not be used elsewhere. Please read WP:Non-free content. If you continue to re-add the image or otherwise continue to violate Wikipedia's Image use policy, I will request that you be blocked from editing. It would be appreciated also if you could acknowledge that you are actually receiving the many messages left on this page.--William S. Saturn (talk) 19:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

James D. Griffin in fact ran for president in 1996 and the Wikipedia page says so. I'd appreciate it if you would leave it there and use your mind and actually read the page. My edits are helpful and informative to the community. If you can let Fred Karger go on the 2012 election pages, you can let Mark Everson go on the 2016 election page. Please stop undoing my helpful edits. I'd appreciate it. Mayor Griffin is a hero in Buffalo and the city was proud when he ran for President in 1996. The page itself for the election mentions him, so let his image be on the page. Block me if you will, I'm trying to get the full story on Wikipedia, and you must like it 100& incomplete. This message is to the following user: William S. Saturn (talk)


 * I'm not saying he didn't run. In fact, I left his name on the page.  What I did was remove the image because it is non-free and there is no fair use rationale to use it on the pages where you wish to use it.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
To enforce an arbitration decision and for adding "potentially contentious" content without obtaining the required "firm consensus", in violation of the sanctions already in effect on the page United States presidential election, 2016, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 21:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark J. F. Schroeder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timothy M. Kennedy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Semmendinger. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rex Tillerson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''This is the second time you've removed pertinent information from this page. If you feel your edits are justified please leave a reason in the comment box before you finish your edit. Otherwise they will keep being reverted. '' Semmendinger (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rex Tillerson. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Semmendinger (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph C. Lorigo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph C. Lorigo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph C. Lorigo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mickeyheadshot.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Mickeyheadshot.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Langworthy


The article Nick Langworthy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not seem to pass WP:NPOL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Help Editing
I believe I'm the only contributor on the New York gubernatorial election, 2018 page. I cannot keep up with the updates. Can someone help?

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CommissionerJoeHolland.png


A tag has been placed on File:CommissionerJoeHolland.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

File:MickeyKearnsClerk.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MickeyKearnsClerk.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:StefanMychajliwVictory.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:StefanMychajliwVictory.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

File:DavidatMarillaCropped.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DavidatMarillaCropped.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MayorJimmyGriffin.jpeg


The file File:MayorJimmyGriffin.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Obviously a photo of a newspaper. Taking a picture of a photo in a newspaper does not transfer copyright."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ChrisJacobsClerk.jpeg


The file File:ChrisJacobsClerk.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Redundant to File:CountyCLERKJacobs.jpeg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Langworthy


The article Nick Langworthy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable 'politician' lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are mostly quotes and some do not mention article subject. Fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bohen.png
Thank you for uploading File:Bohen.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cropped Photo at Desk.png
Thank you for uploading File:Cropped Photo at Desk.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones </b>(Talk) 16:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi Kitty, thanks for your work on US politician articles. Please note that we don't linke common terms like "politician" (and while I'm here, nor years, dates, etc). Thanks. <b style="color:darkgreen">Tony</b> (talk)  07:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ted B. Morton. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I <sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS"> Talk to my owner :Online 17:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lynne Dixon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynne Dixon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lynne Dixon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 06:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wow (talk) 22:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)