User talk:Kittykat21

NEST+m
If you feel so strongly that the NEST+m article needs the material you keep re-inserting, please clean it up. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for expressing your personal opinions ("The NEST+m described in the article no longer exists. Olga Livanis is directly responsible for that."). Neither is it a place from which to organize a campaign ("And so, the question remains...who will help the people that have had grievances? Will it be the resigning members of the PTA Executive committee now that they are freed from the yoke of office? Or will it be you?", "The grievances have been listed. Answer them. Solve the pain."). If there are facts that you'd like to see included in the article (e.g., "The leadership transition at NEST+m has affected the three levels of the K-12 school in different ways. ..."), find citations for them from reputable sources and put them in. If there is further controversy (e.g., the implied racial divide betweek the Upper School and the others), expand that section, again with citations for the sources.

I assume you care about NEST+m. So why not help build the article up?

RossPatterson 04:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

14 November 2006
Please consider Ross's statements above. The repeated addition of the same material is unconstructive and will continue to be reverted. Mytildebang 01:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

18 November 2006
Please stop re-inserting this material into the article. It's opinion, not fact. It doesn't belong there. RossPatterson 15:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)