User talk:Kiwibirdman1701

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sooke Flowline has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://unknownvictoria.blogspot.com/2009/04/drop-to-drink.html (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Sooke Flowline
Hi Kiwibirdman, I've been trying to help a little bit with the article Sooke Flowline that you've been working on. Part of that involved adding two tags calling for more sources and explaining that there may be a problem in terms of original research. You've removed them twice but I've re-added them. These tags need to stay for now, both because they alert readers to possible problems with the article and tell other Wikipedia editors that they can help improve the article with sourcing. If you have any questions about this please let me know, but I would ask you to stop removing the tags until the article is properly sourced, which is absolutely something you should do if you have access to reliable sources which discuss the Sooke Flowline. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 20:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)