User talk:Kiyoshi Motohiko

Danny Kingad
Please quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 08:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Danny Kingad


The article Danny Kingad has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Danny Kingad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Kingad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danny Kingad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:15, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Danny Kingad. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 15:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". ''Please use the minor checkbox only for trivial fixes, such as spelling mistakes or very minor grammar changes. Using it for every edit, as you are doing, just makes it look like you are trying to hide your edits. Please use the minor checkbox correctly. Thank you.'' Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Kiko Matos
I noticed that you have added sources in the article without using inline citations. Have a look at WP:INTREF2 to know more about using inline citations as well as identifying a reliable source as they are strictly vital when contributing to Wikipedia. And please, don't remove maintenance templates without resolving them. So far there are a quite a few sources that does not seem reliable in the article so I'm restoring them. Blue sphere  07:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * May I ask if you're closely associated with Kiko Matos? I might tag the article for WP:COI if so. Blue  sphere  15:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

No, I am not closely associated with the subject. Please bear with me I am still getting the hang of writing and editing here. It even took me a while to figure out how to reply to this message. I have already checked each source I cited and am confident they are all reliable. I am not sure if it is the author's responsibility to delete the reminder box in the first part of the article or just wait for the editors to do it. Please advise. Thank you.


 * Please sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~ ). Blue  sphere  16:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Noted. Thank you for letting me know about this. Kiyoshi Motohiko (talk) 16:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe it's best not to remove the maintenance template about the unreliable sources that are still in the article. Please have a look at WP:Identifying reliable sources to learn more about it. I restored the template back in the article. Blue  sphere  06:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PRehse (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Kiko Matos. Blue sphere  12:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

I apologize. I think I misunderstood the instructions. I thought I should clean the template that appears at the top after fixing the issues. I have reviewed all the sources cited, removed those that may not pass Wikipedia standards and kept those that are 100% reliable. Please do check. Thank you. Kiyoshi Motohiko (talk) 12:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mister Ocean (November 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dlohcierekim was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mister Ocean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mister_Ocean Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dlohcierekim&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mister_Ocean reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mister Ocean concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mister Ocean, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mister Ocean


Hello, Kiyoshi Motohiko. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mister Ocean".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kiko Matos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiko Matos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kiko Matos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandals1 (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Conan Altatis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Conan Altatis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conan Altatis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Conan Altatis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Migsmigss. An edit that you recently made to Beatrice Gomez seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please observe coherence in structure when editing. Good grammar, sentence flow, and cohesiveness are desired in each edit. If an edit does not improve an entry's content, and even downgrades its, it will be to its overall quality's disadvantage. Thanks.'' Migsmigss (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia and putting blog websites as reference, as you did at Miss Universe 2021. Blogs are not considered as a reliable source of information for Wikipedia. Likeinthemovies (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)