User talk:Kizule

Welcome!
Hi, Zoranzoki21. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Local copies of files
Please respect the Template:Keep local markings on files when requesting deletion of files that have been copied to Commons. SpinningSpark 21:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Dabfix on Dorsum
So because of I've implemented a feature to remind users to keep descriptions terse per MOS:DABENTRY. Please clean it up. — Dispenser 18:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Komentari
Drago mi je da ti je istekla blokada, bilo je potpuno nepotrebno, naravno rasprave su prošlost. Učinili su mi uslugu na neki način, više neću raditi nove članke na srpskoj vikipediji, neću raditi na portalima, kao ni patroliranje i ostale izmene koje su u cilju održavanja vikipedije. I onako će se pojaviti studenti i novi korisnici koji će to uraditi. Jedino ću se fokusirati na članke koje sam ja uradio, ali i to vrlo malo. Izbegavaj rasprave i uživaj. Sve najbolje i hvala za podršku.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Page move discussion
As I am sure you want an answer to your question on this page, the rule against canvassing is found at WP:Canvassing. That guideline also points to other helpful pages, for example, the link to WP:Disruptive editing, which the blocked editor did by both canvassing and by bludgeoning that discussion. There's really no defense for all that – you might think there is, but there isn't. In debate discussions, editors try to build consensus; however, there are rules to this process that we are all expected to follow. The blocked editor did not seem to be interested in following the rules, to the detriment of other editors in that debate.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  16:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reply! Zoranzoki21 (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Pleasure!  Paine 

Unblock
--UTRSBot (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

July 2020
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page FEM. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Please see WP:DABACRO before adding lots of articles/bios that do not use the acro in the article (title/alt name)  Widefox ; talk 14:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Notice
Hello Kizule. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kizule. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
 * I'm not paid for any edits on Wikimedia Foundation's projects. Best regards! Kizule (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello, Kizule. It seems that you've done two COI edits up-to-date. I would like you to comply with Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use (see WP:PAID and disclose your COI on your userpage before editing articles like Jared Madere and Miyu Nagaoka. If this doesn't settles here then I've to bring this to WP:COIN unfortunately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.19.83 (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not paid for any edits. I'm aware of your attacks. Kizule (talk) 06:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Kemi Filani Blog moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kemi Filani Blog, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kemi Filani Blog (May 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kemi Filani Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kemi Filani Blog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kemi_Filani_Blog Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kemi_Filani_Blog reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Chiddie Anyasodo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Chiddie Anyasodo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I got confused here, as I've created that page in the Draft namespace, but I saw that someone else made edits and moved it out of the draft namespace, then you moved it back into the draft.
 * Thank you for your understanding! Kizule (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chiddie Anyasodo


A tag has been placed on Draft:Chiddie Anyasodo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GPL93 (talk) 19:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.174.89.81.141 (talk) 01:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text  at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must: GeneralNotability (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.


 * Please explain what you mean by I'm doing it voluntarily as asked by person in interest. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I mean "I was doing it", no that I'm doing it. My phone has corrected my typing incorrectly. Kizule (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


 * That was not the central part of my question. Who is the "person in interest" and what did they "ask" you to do? --Blablubbs (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You could probably help clear some of this up @Kizule if you explained where exactly you were asked (per your unblock request) by the person "in interest". I'm not an administrator but I think the community would like to hear about this. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks like that administrators were in hurry to block me. In that case, I'm fine with block. Best regards! Kizule (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * A non-answer isn't really ideal since it violates the TOU. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kemi Filani Blog
Hello, Kizule. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kemi Filani Blog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kemi Filani Blog


Hello, Kizule. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kemi Filani Blog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

October 2023

 * Nobody cares that you are an admin somewhere else. You were blocked for violating TOU, for which you still have not been honest. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 * For which edits I'm blocked exactly? Can you provide me diffs? Kizule (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * plus some now-deleted edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)