User talk:Kjcedit

Welcome!
Hello, Kjcedit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kristu Jayanti College Autonomous, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! M. Caecilius (talk) 07:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Kristu Jayanti College Autonomous


A tag has been placed on Kristu Jayanti College Autonomous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/KristuJayantiCollege/info. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Dear Admin, Kind note: I am the academic fraternity and member of Kristu Jayanti College Autonomous, I possess the full rights to take the material from our Institution website, http://kristujayanti.edu.in/index.php,, I believe you wont delete the page, a humble request, if any more query I would be happy to reply you. If required I would like to give you feedback from the official email id of the institution which may likely to clear the doubt. let me know where should I write email, so that the misconception arised due to copyright may be resolved, Happy to cooperate. Thank you If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. M. Caecilius (talk) 07:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shrikanthv (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Reply: Thank You for the constant feedback: In concern with the above mentioned conclusion. I can provide with valuable and concrete reference. I live in Bangalore and I have the full rights to contribute the right information to the reader by maintaining the authenticity. As mentioned above remark of personal analysis which i feel need to re-look and admin should consider the up-dation of the outdated data published here, the above information is a kind of monopolistic information published in wikipedia or rather I would say paid version of publication. where the limitation information does not serve the public of India at large, when you say Indian Institute of Science or IIM they can cater to few individuals only and not to all. India have a large population, and as the time passed by, various renowned institute have rosed to the heights of IIMs or any other IITs. Kindly request to consider the updated statistics. The limited version is purely monopolistic and does not serve the public at large, and constant monitoring of the information about Bangalore is respected but by not allowing the true information to be mentioned is not praise worthy. There are two kind of success, either one compete purely ethically or other way one dominate other and try to show that they are the best in the market. We would request you to relook into the matter and give a fair judgement, URL for the reference 1) http://indiatoday.intoday.in/bestcolleges/2013/ranks.jsp?ST=Arts&LMT=31&Y=2013 2) http://www.karnataka.com/education/karnataka-college-ranking-2013/ 3) http://www.timegurus.com/bcom_college_ranking.htm 4) http://www.eduvidya.com/Top-MBA-Colleges-in-Karnataka 5) http://indiaranker.com/colleges/bba/bangalore I have mentioned few url as a document of relevance and proof.

Your recent editing history at Bangalore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Neil N  talk to me  14:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. ''Please discuss in relevant talk page, also go through the links that has been put up by other contributors before creating a new article and if you need any help do contact me at my talk page. please note that wiki is not a site for advertisment'' Shrikanthv (talk) 05:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Hi Shrikanthv I believe you are misunderstanding me, I understand that if I copy directly from web pages you have the full entitle to remove it as it may not come under the terms and conditions of the Wikipedia. It is not for any promotional perpose but rather, I have updated the data which I feel it is required. I can see you have been protecting the page, very much appreciated but by not letting the update of the page seems to me something else, which I believe you would be able to explain more?. I have mentioned requisite reference as a proof, why Kristu Jayanti College should be there among other institute. Inspite of the the reference cited above if you not let me update the page which is very much required, I would rather say, which I really do not want to say, You are blaming with out any proper judgement, which I really do not appreciate. I would request you to revert back, Which I have updated. I will be waiting for the move from your side. or else I have to take necessary help from the wikipedia to sort it out. Let me know, Your final call. Thanking You.


 * Hi, Thank your for your comment, <\br>

you are mentioning about "Very much required" by whom ? ,Note that wiki is not news, please go through this here WP:ISNOT ,Your link is not working and mere one link in list of best of colleges provided is really not notable criteria, but still if you feel it is, please discuss in the talk pages where you are trying to insert the institute name (before inserting) Also note that you may have vested interest in advertising the institute as you have been adding pictures and information in many pages like culture in bangalore, karnataka.... and really have not seen any other significant contribution to any other article. also note that there are thousands of college claiming thousands of things, we cannot simply add this to page of the city based in them, If you are really are interested to contribute would recommend many article to improve in Bangalore or karnataka itself and then I think you will understand why i am doing what i am doing. and  please take your "call" when ever you think its necessary Shrikanthv (talk) 07:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Education in Bangalore for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Education in Bangalore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Education in Bangalore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 10:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I have been properly framed by the educated admin, who had used their skills, request to unblock the ip address. I would be contributing as per the terms and conditions of wikipedia, which i was not aware of.