User talk:Kjibrahim

Speedy deletion nomination of Phace designs
A tag has been placed on Phace designs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Phace designs and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The article Phace designs has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

It's marked as an Article for Deletion, so any discussion on its suitability ought to be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phace designs. Thanks, --Oscarthecat (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Also, please see Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gas2gif.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gas2gif.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phace Designs
A tag has been placed on Phace Designs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 00:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Your request for help
Now I might be in a sort of conflict of interest by being the first to respond to your request for help, but first let me tell you that deletion is not the end of everything for a topic here, since the article can always be recreated.

This said, the first thing you might want to do before you start writing an article is check whether its topic meets the relevant notability guideline, in your case that would be the guidelines on corporations. The best way to do that would be to find third-party references to it that are not blogs, forums, MySpace pages, or any page from a site that accepts unverified user input, or any page from a site where the subject has any editorial input.

Then, once you are able to establish notability, you can start writing the article. You certainly want the first draft to at least assert that the company does indeed meet the relevant notability guidelines, and that is what that first draft should focus on. Once this is done, and notability is asserted, then you want to make sure that what is asserted is also established, that is, you want to insert the references that show that what you asserted can be verified.

Once these two things are done, then the article is here to stay.

However, if, before you start writing the article, you feel that you are unable to show that the company meets our notability guidelines, then I'm sorry, but there is no way to make sure an article on it will be kept, although there is also no way to tell how long it will take before it is nominated for deletion. See WP:AKON. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Phace designs
I have nominated Phace designs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Phace designs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oscarthecat (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oscarthecat (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)